Fashion and lifestyle trends were a good way of depicting the wealth of people in the ‘30s. Even though many were struck due to the Great Depression, they found time and money to invest in formal dresses and suits. People often recognize the ‘30s as a decade of frustration and disparity. However, the workmen found themselves purchasing long slacks and a formal shirt. Overall, fashion played in role in contrasting social classes and an individual’s wealth. There was a subtle contrast in the items and styles that men and women adjusted to in the ‘30s.
Men’s fashion consisted of different trends and clothing options. Many men didn’t have the time to purchase luxurious work suits or tuxes. Gentlemen often consisted of plain dress shirts and tops. In otherwise, men didn’t dress up to impress, but rather to define their definition of status in a community. Furthermore, the occupations would define the style of clothing for a man’s wardrobe. In the south, professions often included farming and agricultural style jobs rather than manufacturing and construction work in the northeastern parts of the U.S. recognized as one of the recognizable trend …show more content…
The 1930’s was the decade of swimsuits which were comfortable and stylish that boasted a new material known as nylon. Designers such as Coco Chanel, Madeleine Vionnet, Schiaparelli, and Charles Worth obtained the highest prices on their merchandise. These designers revolutionized the way fabrics could be manufactured to be effective for everyone. There was a gap in clothing prices reliant on the region people lived in. Rural areas in the south persisted of inexpensive fabrics for shirts, coats, shoes, and slacks usually ranging around $2.50-$12. Urban manufacturing areas contained clothing prices around $3.95-$25. Overall, the prices weren’t relatively close to the prices that current brands hold. [1930’s