In 2014 James Tully presented new study “On Global Citizenship”. The mere essence of this analytical work is to draw attention of the international community to the ongoing crisis of global citizenship as democratic institute. From the early beginning of the reading of this paper, the readers get information about the nature of the global citizenship as separate concept available for people of the democratic countries. At the same time, the author points out that the crisis with the maintenance of this institution is reflected in the inability of the citizens of several states to address properly the issues of the globalization affecting the activity of the countries and living of people there. In this respect, the author identifies the dimensions
…show more content…
For the achievement of the perfect form of the citizenship, the justice account of this legal concept should be invoked. Given this fact the diverse citizenship is interrelated with the modern citizenship. This implies that people tend to follow legal norms and rules maintained by particular society while every person defines personal limits arising from the moral and ethical beliefs similar to particular social group. Thus, the limit in form of the moral rights of the citizenship arises. This notion should be understood as the legal requirements of justice system for local citizens in the performance of their obligations. Furthermore, the diverse citizenship exists in the manner when there is no differentiation between people based on certain factor. In turn, the citizens of certain community fight for the realization and protection of moral values without evident regard to the citizenship. At the same time, diverse form of the citizenship should be aligned with the modern type. In particular, the state should develop and found appropriate state bodies that are adjusted to the needs of local population in order to protect the rights of these people …show more content…
The first type of the governance of the civil rights is prior and complementary to the modern citizenship because of some reasons. In particular, the experience of the majority of the European states should be considered. The members of European community pursued desire to exercise primary form of the diverse citizenship where different social and ethnical groups were fight for the recognition in this society. Nowadays one can observe that the rights of these people are protected completely while their operation is linked to the existence of the modern citizenship. In addition, the people gained opportunity to be represented in the participatory bodies under the lieu of modern citizenship. Therefore, the contribution of the diverse citizenship to the modern form is confirmed. In assessment the limits of the modern citizenship and its diverse form, the author concludes that the first type is restrictive in nature to the Western cultures. Although, the diverse form of the citizenship manages to survive under any conditions and legal inequalities. In fact, people always looking for the extension of the limits of freedom. Given the fact that the operation of the modern citizenship is linked to the operation of the numerous institutions in the country, diverse citizenship allows for people to think differently against
For the achievement of the perfect form of the citizenship, the justice account of this legal concept should be invoked. Given this fact the diverse citizenship is interrelated with the modern citizenship. This implies that people tend to follow legal norms and rules maintained by particular society while every person defines personal limits arising from the moral and ethical beliefs similar to particular social group. Thus, the limit in form of the moral rights of the citizenship arises. This notion should be understood as the legal requirements of justice system for local citizens in the performance of their obligations. Furthermore, the diverse citizenship exists in the manner when there is no differentiation between people based on certain factor. In turn, the citizens of certain community fight for the realization and protection of moral values without evident regard to the citizenship. At the same time, diverse form of the citizenship should be aligned with the modern type. In particular, the state should develop and found appropriate state bodies that are adjusted to the needs of local population in order to protect the rights of these people …show more content…
The first type of the governance of the civil rights is prior and complementary to the modern citizenship because of some reasons. In particular, the experience of the majority of the European states should be considered. The members of European community pursued desire to exercise primary form of the diverse citizenship where different social and ethnical groups were fight for the recognition in this society. Nowadays one can observe that the rights of these people are protected completely while their operation is linked to the existence of the modern citizenship. In addition, the people gained opportunity to be represented in the participatory bodies under the lieu of modern citizenship. Therefore, the contribution of the diverse citizenship to the modern form is confirmed. In assessment the limits of the modern citizenship and its diverse form, the author concludes that the first type is restrictive in nature to the Western cultures. Although, the diverse form of the citizenship manages to survive under any conditions and legal inequalities. In fact, people always looking for the extension of the limits of freedom. Given the fact that the operation of the modern citizenship is linked to the operation of the numerous institutions in the country, diverse citizenship allows for people to think differently against