The puppet strings of the argument of slavery were controlled by the politicians, who determined the direction in which the conflict would go. For the Whigs or the Republicans, the majority of whom resided in the North, the very existence of slavery in the U.S. contradicted …show more content…
As with today’s political system, the two parties attempted to persuade as many states to align with their beliefs on slavery, with the Whigs, later known as Republicans, siding against slavery, and the Democrats fighting for it. The country became divided into slave territories and free territories, represented as the South and North, respectively. Unfortunately, when the country attempts to keep adding new states, that complicates which states side with whom, as shown with the inclusions of Missouri and …show more content…
The first came through literature; those authors who strongly opposed the persecution of blacks and all slaves made their voices heard in their writing. In addition, several of the abolitionists gave speeches on what they believed in. Furthermore, those speeches often came from people who experienced slavery personally, and knew how it felt to have no rights whatsoever. At the core of abolitionism lies several important individuals who dedication to abolishing slavery would benefit generations to come.
Each famous abolitionist dedicated their beliefs to one specific group, whether through writing or speeches. For literature, Harriet Beecher Stowe shocked audiences with her novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin, while William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Jackson Turner adamantly spoke out in their writings. Several speeches were given by former slave Frederick Douglass, in addition to Harriet Tubman, who helped with the underground railroad. While politicians Daniel Webster and Henry Clay could also be considered abolitionists, they possess a certain level of hypocrisy based on their