Madison, it can be noted that the Marshall’s decision was formulated and reasoned according to the principle of judicial review, that is the right to trial constitutionality of public authorities regulations. Being a Federalist, Marshall broke this principle timely, made it well-grounded and introduced it in judicial practice when the fate and prospects of the young American republic were being established. The actual significance of Marshall’s decision regarding the case Marbury vs. Madison, influenced by federalistic views of the chief justice, was the fact that the Supreme Court came to the political scene of the country. Therefore, by assigning the right to interpret any law for compliance with the Constitution, the court became an important component of not only judicial but also political system of the United
Madison, it can be noted that the Marshall’s decision was formulated and reasoned according to the principle of judicial review, that is the right to trial constitutionality of public authorities regulations. Being a Federalist, Marshall broke this principle timely, made it well-grounded and introduced it in judicial practice when the fate and prospects of the young American republic were being established. The actual significance of Marshall’s decision regarding the case Marbury vs. Madison, influenced by federalistic views of the chief justice, was the fact that the Supreme Court came to the political scene of the country. Therefore, by assigning the right to interpret any law for compliance with the Constitution, the court became an important component of not only judicial but also political system of the United