Kant's Ethical Theory Analysis

Superior Essays
This paper will highlight Kant’s ethical theory that is presented in his book Foundations of a Metaphysic Morals. Kant wanted to establish an ethical system anyone can figure out regardless of sexual orientation, religion, race etc. Kant’s ethical “specialty” is deontology the study of duty. This paper explains want duty is, and all the other factors that goes along with this ideology. I will be presenting two different examples and explaining how Kant would approach the situation using his beliefs. Those examples will be used to help support the following position that Kant’s methods of establishing duties is unsuccessful. Jessica had just gotten her heart broken by Jason, she just could not accept the thought of not being with him. So, she knew this guy Zack had been crushing on her for a while now, she though that asking him out, and Jason seeing her with a new guy would make him jealous and want her back. Of course, Zack said yes, and Jessica was sure that …show more content…
Kant does a good job of establishing that you cannot make exceptions to rules you want others to follow, and you cannot treat people like things. Kant’s ethical theory does have respect for people and doing the right thing simply because they are doing the right thing. The examples I gave were people not doing the right thing and failing the maxim making them not okay for the world. However, the aspects of the dilemma that were problematic were how exactly should the maxim be created, what is too broad of a maxim or what is to narrow. Also, consequences did not matter, for the first example Skylar had an ideal of what was happening with her friend but choose not to stop it. Kant’s ethical theory dose a good job of caring for people, just not every aspect of each party involved in the situation under certain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defining Kant’s definition of will, duty, maxim, and categorical imperative will help in the discussion of this scandal. Kant’s theory states that an individual should treat others like…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, Harriet is stuck between a dilemma of choosing who to save and she chooses to save the individual that is inherently more valuable. This paper supports Harriet’s decision by using Kantian ethics such as Kant’s theory on moral praise, Kant’s theory on imperfect duties, and finally by Kant’s formulation analysis of a categorical imperative. I will use Kantian ethics to support why Harriet deserves moral praise. After supporting why Harriet deserves moral praise I will briefly discuss the arguments against why Harriet does not deserve moral praise under Kantian ethics.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is not interested in content instead, he gives rules of procedure, He believes that you make you “you”. The possibility to construct a universal maxim is to justify the actions of an individual. His guidelines to morality allow for a paradoxical course where a seemingly immoral act such as a suicide bomber can completely coincide with ethical principles within the guidelines he has set. The person evil in a case such as this would be a complex evil centered within the self but not realized with the self. The consequences do not matter to Kant.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Ethics Analysis

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A fundamental idea behind Kantian ethics is that every human being has intrinsic value. Further more each human adopts self-governance and the intelligence to act in accord with moral virtues. The culmination of moral ethos to which all actions, duties, and piety amass is a categorical imperative, or an absolute precept. Kant’s use of the categorical imperative is connected to utilitarianism and principles taught by Christ in the New Testament by delineating correct methods of making moral decisions. Kant’s arguments of acting in accord to our maxim ties closely to some of Christ’s recorded teachings, yet at the same time his views that correct ends are reached a priori which guides moral action while John Stuart Mill contends that the best…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay aims to present a formulation of the categorical Imperative called the Humanity Formulation and deem it as a sufficient and plausible condition in determining moral worth. As a deontologist, Immanuel Kant believes that an action's moral worth is determined by the motive rather than the consequences it leads to and the focus of our moral actions should be on duty. This idea, called the categorical imperative, was a central and supreme concept of morality in Kantian ethics. The categorical imperative has four formulations but this essay focuses only on one; the Humanity Formulation. This formulation is perhaps the one with the most appeal and resonance with us because the two basic notions derived from it regard treating persons…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert E. Kant Analysis

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant and many other philosophers hold that one has duties to oneself, including a duty to refrain from harmful activities. I, like Kant and many philosophers, believe that there can be duties that one owes to oneself. Refraining from smoking is one of these duties owed to oneself. Robert E. Goodin used a paternalist perspective to describe refraining from smoking as a duty owed to oneself. He explains that public officials are bound to evaluate one’s preferences and judge them according to a standard of one’s own deeper preferences.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, when there is any controversial issue, it is important to take perspectives from the scholars of the past, and to learn about what they have to offer. For obvious reasons, it isn 't possible to get their opinions on the specific issues. But it is possible to use their doctrines that they wrote about and apply them to the real world scenarios in question. The conflict that recently caught the media’s attention is about CEO Martin Shkreli. To be more specific the questions: “is what he is doing fair?…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet, despite its influence, Kantian ethics seems to have several weaknesses. First, since people are emotional beings, reason and rationality is usually not enough to motivate them act morally. Another weakness is that Kant’s categorical imperative allows for much mistreatment of animals that should not be considered morally right. Therefore, although Kantian ethics provides many strong arguments, one should always critically evaluate the ideas that are presented, especially when it deals with such a subtle and controversial issue as…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant is a well know German philosopher who is considered to be the central figure to modern philosophy. In 1785, one of his famous works, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, was first published. This text is split up into three section, and within the second section is Kant’s well known moral theory. This theory states that everything in nature works according to laws and in order for a law to be a moral law, it must be a universal law. These laws apply to all rational beings, there are no exceptions.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kantian moral theory gives some crucial good bits of knowledge, yet once…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays