Martin’s analysis in the Sex and Gender: The Egg and the Sperm: How Science has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles suggests that scientific observation and description are not neutral as they are built on socially constructed norms that reinforce dominant stereotypes. As such, science is seen as one social institution that reproduces and reinforces these patriarchal values seen in society. In Martin’s article, she draws on examples that propose the role of the egg and sperm in ways that devalue females while simultaneously privileging males. Additionally, Martin shows that scientific discourse used to describe the process of reproduction uses many stereotypes. Such stereotypes include the “damsel-in-distress” and the idea that the male reproductive system is great and morally worthy while the females is bad and corrupt (CITE). Similarly, when referring to the attributes of the sperm and the egg, Martin shows how scientific discourse reproduces gender roles (CITE). It can be seen that the sperm is depicted as strong, powerful, taking the role of a leader and being brave. While the egg is seen as being passive, fragile, completed when the sperm penetrates her and useless until the sperm gives it meaning (CITE). Therefore, this article further illustrates how biological discourse is not neutral because it is constructed to depict ideas seen in society. Ideas that reinforce …show more content…
The social construction of gender and gender performativity is something that is perpetuated from birth. There are socially constructed ideas of the toys each sex should play with and the colour of clothes kids should wear. Even in media, men are instilled with the idea of putting on a “tough guise”. In the 90s, big action stars such as Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger emerged as studs with particular bodies and perpetuating a certain kind of masculinity. In these movies, they often have to save a vulnerable girl from harm. A failure to do so would be seen as them being sissies, “uncool” and not tough. Twenty years later, the “damsel-in-distress” mentality is still perpetuated in media today. Therefore, the social construction theory is one that is prevalent in everyone’s life and is something that needs to be challenged and deconstructed to allow women, and others who are oppressed by it to be given equal access and equal opportunity that those in positions of power