Additionally, it would be highly unlikely that the exclusion of evidence would be to such a degree that a case would allow for a defendant to go free unless sufficient evidence was not available to secure the conviction, to begin with. I would like to believe that, as in my office, there is more than sufficient evidence available to win a case, and that its fate is not dependent on a single source of information or evidence. …show more content…
Likewise, the exclusionary rule mandates that law enforcement / designees assure that the investigations are conducted on a professional level and that suspects and witness information and evidence are handled properly. As Hall states, “without the exclusionary rule, the Bill of Rights is ineffective. Why have constitutional standards if there is no method to enforcement them?”