There is hardly any ethos in the article, the minute amount is present when Carr breaks down his actual experiences for the audience. It’s as if he tries to back the claim by his own findings. As a result, it hurts the ethos by not providing enough for the people to lean on the claim. There is a small note that Carr has written a book about technology but there is no obvious answer his career or his credibility as an author. Without the knowledge, a reader aren’t certain that Carr’s article is accurate coming from just a standpoint on ethos and pathos
There is hardly any ethos in the article, the minute amount is present when Carr breaks down his actual experiences for the audience. It’s as if he tries to back the claim by his own findings. As a result, it hurts the ethos by not providing enough for the people to lean on the claim. There is a small note that Carr has written a book about technology but there is no obvious answer his career or his credibility as an author. Without the knowledge, a reader aren’t certain that Carr’s article is accurate coming from just a standpoint on ethos and pathos