At the onset of the authors’ investigation, …show more content…
As this manuscript demonstrates, history and the past are two very different things. Generally, history is more formal and distant while the past connects each individual to form a bond that would otherwise be nonexistent. The past encompasses family, friends, and community among other aspects of life, and as one respondent explained, “When you think about the past, you feel comfortable, like you belong, and that is the way I feel with my family.” This is a recurring theme throughout the responses, and the ties to family appear to bind people with history in a way that turns the subject from words in a textbook into a topic of substance. This inescapable connection to the past enables individuals to experience history frequently, and is perhaps one of the most accessible forms of the past. Capturing moments with photography, attending family reunions, and sharing information with future generations aids in engaging people with the past. The value of this information is priceless for the people that pursue it. Discovering the past in this way is something individuals can easily relate to, and it ties them to a time they may not have felt …show more content…
Connecting individuals to their past seemed to be the most effective because it engaged people, and even if they questioned their knowledge, it revealed that they were more aware of the past than they previously thought. While the gathering of data was not traditional, it was nevertheless extremely valuable.
Considering that many people believe approaching the past on their own terms is crucial to their comprehension, an effective engagement between historians and the public would center on each individual. The connection between their past and history in general, illustrates that their ancestors helped shaped history which contributes to the appreciation that what they learned in grade school or from other sources does apply to