The need for Criminal Gain/Status was chosen as many disciple killers commit murder to gain the respect, love, or approval from a person that they worship and admire like a gang or cult leader.Therefore, the offender evaluates their potential criminal status (respect/approval from a person) from their leader for killing an individual.Additionally, to commit murder, the element of an absence of a capable guardian must also be present, because it is easier for the criminal to perform murder if the target is being unguarded. The third element of duration from Attachment Theory was chosen as disciple killers are committing murder to gain love, respect, attention. Consequently, the criminal did not maintain a lifelong bond filled with attention and love from their parents as they are pursuing an emotional bond from other authority figures. Collectively these three elements yield an insight into the possible motivations of the offender through the need for criminal gain and duration. Addtionaly the absence of a capable guardian allows insight into the victimology of the crime. Therefore, a disciple killer commits murder due to the lack of long-lasting attachment in his life which compels them to hunt out an individual to give them love and attention. Additionally, the offender perpetrates homicide to gain status and …show more content…
Duration Theory has three tenets which can all be explained without many parts. Consequently, the theory is coherent. The Theory can additionally be applied to many different modus operandi of disciple killers included in cult or gang environments. The scope of the Duration Theory can also explain and be applied to many variations in types of offenders and victims. The theory also has logical constancy as it is rational in explaining why disciple mass murder committed the crime and why they chose a particular victim. This theory can be testable, by testing each element individually. First, you would research past disciple killers and interview them about their motivations to see if they committed. Additionally, it can utilize these same methods to see why individuals joined groups or followed disciples.Additionally, you can implement target hardening policy to notice if having capable guardians in certain areas reduces crime as well as studying the victimology of similar offenders. This theory lacks empirical validity as these elements have not been researched together. However, Routine Activities Theory has been one of the most tested theories including the element of the absence of a capable guardian has empirical validity. So,