How effective are interpreters in assisting LEP/ESL clients in articulating concerns and understanding procedures in the courtroom?
Hypothesis: Because individuals are limited English proficient (LEP), having an interpreter present positively affects courtroom interaction, as individuals are able to understand courtroom procedures and articulate their concerns to the judges.
2. Does the use of an interpreter affect protective order outcomes in DV cases?
Hypothesis: The use of an interpreter increases the chances of an applicant receiving a protective order.
3. What are the potential limitations in accessing justice (successful protective order outcomes)?
Hypothesis: Language related issues (ability to read, comprehend, or communicate) and understanding courtroom procedures are potential limitations to LEP (ESL) persons accessing justice.
4. Are LEP/ESLs more likely to request an advocate in the courtroom than English proficient persons?
Hypothesis: LEP/ESLs are more likely to request an advocate in the courtroom than EP persons.