General Sherman Research Paper

Improved Essays
Dean Settimi
Mr. Kroiss
US History
December 16th, 2016
Sherman's March
Even though that most people are aware that generals during the Civil War kill their enemies in order to win, a few people realize that General Sherman had a direct impact during the end of the civil war because of his strategy of total warfare which resulted in General Sherman barely killing any of the confederates, and his army which quickened the wars end and saved the countries lives. General Sherman had a direct impact during the end of the Civil War because General Sherman’s union army barely killed any of the confederate’s army. First of all, the death toll for The Confederates was 650 soldiers which was an extremely low casualty amount. Sherman only lost 62 of his
…show more content…
“War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.” (General Sherman). General Sherman focused more on destroying than killing, since General Sherman thinks that killing is cruelty, especially if the confederates are Americans as well and he feels that fighting his own kind of people doesn't seem right. If it wasn’t for General Sherman’s Leadership, the death toll for both sides could have increased. The Civil War would be impossible to end, and the war would just change from tactical warfare to a ginormous slaughter house of dead American soldiers.
General Sherman also had a direct impact during the end of the civil war because General Sherman’s union army destroyed resources that aided the confederates. General Sherman seen It as a “symbol of Confederate pride and strength, and its fall made even the most loyal Southerners doubt that they could win the war.”(History.com Staff)“General Sherman’s troops captured Atlanta on September 2, 1864. This was an important triumph, because Atlanta was a railroad hub and the industrial center of the Confederacy.”(History.com Staff) The confederacy “had munitions factories, foundries and warehouses that kept
…show more content…
In these later conflicts, largely through the use of air power, Americans attempted to destroy enemy will and logistics (a doctrine colloquially known as “shock and awe” in Operation Iraqi Freedom). On the ground and on a much smaller scale, Sherman pioneered this process, becoming the first American to do so systematically. He is rightly called the American father of total warfare, a harbinger of the psychological tactics of the next century.”(William T. Sherman) If its wasnt for general Shermans total warfare tactic, then the civil war would be nothing but slaughtering and would have made the war extremely difficult to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While Jefferson Davis pursued a defensive strategy, he believed the northerners would soon become tired of war and let South withdraw from the Union. Lincoln used the superior human, economic, and natural resources of the North to repress the South into submission. In the first year, both leaders became highly frustrated. Lincoln's greatest frustration was military leadership. The Union troops were under Ulysses S. Grant control and with his help, they gained triumphs in the Mississippi Valley.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman) having both excelled within the military and educational ranks have pivotal roles within the Civil War. Now, which one of these two military leaders had a stronger influential impact within the war, Stonewall Jackson, or T. Sherman? Evaluation: The main source used within this essay civilwar.org. This site offers information on the two generals used to construct this essay, William T. Sherman and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. The site is a (.org) which means it is run organization and is credited with having resourceful information.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over 600,000 casualties was the devastating result of the Civil War, America’s bloodiest military conflict. The South’s decision to secede from the Union is what prompted the onset of the Civil War, which started April 12, 1861- May 9,1865. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was a Colonel for the Union army. Although he was in multiple battles in the Civil War, he is most remembered for his role in the Battle of Gettysburg. Of all battles fought during the Civil War, it was argued that the Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest and deadliest battle because it resulted in roughly 50,000 casualties.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance of the Civil War The Civil War in 50 Objects, by Henry Holzer and the New-York Historical Society, is a collection of fifty primary sources, varying in type and format. Each of these objects is accompanied by a description of the source, as well as a story which establishes the source in the proper context in history. Through the sources Holzer shows the importance of the Civil War, especially for the people who lived through it. The Civil War transformed the United States in many ways, bringing lasting change to our nation, and establishing the war as important to everyone in the country, even up to today.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading Daniel Sutherland’s “Abraham Lincoln, John Pope and the Origins of Total War”, Sutherland describes how Sherman/Grant may have carried out a dominant plan in successfully ending the war, but that John Pope deserves the majority of the credit for originating it. One of Sutherland’s points he tries to get across to the reader is how the Lincoln’s 1862 summer is pushed towards making drastic, yet rushed decisions on the lasting conflict between the north and south over slavery. Because of this, Sutherland describes how Lincoln hires John Pope to direct an army to victory with a plan unlike any other, planning to strike hard and fast to end the conflict. However, Sutherland also describes how Pope’s plan and leadership backfires due to a poorly planned, aggressive evasion, leaving Sherman/Grant to take over Pope’s failed idea, which is then carried out and wins the war. For this, I believe that Sherman/Grant’s “idea“ to win the war is a bit unfair due to using Pope’s plan, however to a positive decent as the United States eventually benefits from the resolution.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Battle Analysis: Battle of Stones River The purpose of this paper is to describe how the Confederate Army of Tennessee could have used Intelligence assets to minimize losses and achieve victory during the Battle of Stones River in Murfreesboro, Tennessee during the winter from December 3, 1862 to January 2, 1863. The Battle of Stones River was a significant turning point in the Civil War. It is the final battle of the Stones River Campaign of the Western Theater. The campaign includes four other battles, most notably the brief Confederate invasion of Kentucky.…

    • 2331 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    VICKSBURG: A TIPPING POINT IN THE CIVIL WAR USAACE NCOA SSG Chad M. West 15Z SLC 17-003 SFC Maradol The Battle of Vicksburg was a collective land and naval battle that ensured a strategic location for the Union Army (Burden, 2000). Although, not as well-known as the Battle of Gettysburg or Fort Sumter, this was a tremendous victory for the Union Army as it helped to establish a much needed supply chain. Also, to note, the actual timeframe of the battle only lasted a couple of months, the push for this small town and port was a year in the making, as multiple attempts were made and failed to take this piece of land.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sherman was considered to be the first general to use what would be considered total war meaning that he would not only target the military but civilization as well as take out the the…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman Dbq Essay

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This exactly was Sherman, and I bet everyone, was feeling after 4 years of fighting. In Document C the author states in lines 2 and 3, “... the only way the people in Atlanta can hope once more to live in peace and quiet at home, is to stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride.” In case you didn’t know what perpetuated means it’s when something is everlasting or never changing. So, by knowing this you can infer that Sherman wanted to just end the war, like most people at this time. And by feeling this way he felt that the best way to end the war quickly is by taking over Atlanta and then from there destroying everything.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jefferson Davis decision to take the fort showed his strength and devotion to the Confederate States, and efficiently coerced other states to join his cause. However, President Lincoln displayed his brilliant tactics by holding his ground in regards to the Constitution and by entrapping the Confederate soldiers to be the aggressors or to be seen as weak. Without a doubt, both the Union and the Confederates were led by ingenious…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Sherman’s capture Sherman instructed the Union strengths of the Western Theater. The principle Union power in this fight was…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fact that the top Confederate brass, including Jefferson Davis himself, had sanctioned a botched operation meant to kidnap President Lincoln is at least indicative of their willingness to take the next step and do away with Lincoln altogether in order to win the war…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherman once blurted out to a fellow officer: "I am a damned sight smarter than Grant; I know a great deal more about war, military history, strategy and grand tactics than he does....” (Military Leadership of North and South) Sherman recognized that the Northern military leaders were smarter and knew what it would take to win the Civil war. The Northern leaders were smart enough to prohibit freedom of speech and other liberties to keep the soldiers obedient and disciplined. They won the war due to the superiority of the Northern leaders and their ability to suspend certain liberties, the advantage that allowed the little guy to win in the past, that the South…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On April 26, 1865, nearly 90,000 soldiers had surrendered under Joseph E. Johnston in The Army of Tennessee; they had surrendered to Major General William T. Sherman. It became the largest surrender of the Confederate forces in the war, thus, essentially bringing the American Civil War to an end (Macpherson 1). So, how did the Civil War change America? The Civil War is an important and vital piece of American History that everyone should know about, also become aware on how it changed the way we live our lives today in America.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All in all, the victories for the Union at the Battle of Gettysburg and Vicksburg reassured a turning point of the American Civil War. The Battle of Gettysburg took away all the possibilities of the Confederates acquiring help from Britain and France. After the loss for the Confederates, being able to invade the Northern soil become a very vague and rare thought. After having the ability to siege Vicksburg, the Union led it 's way to winning the Civil War. The moral boost that was received along small and large battles, led to the fact that the Union had a better chance of unifying the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays