As it was assisted by the lack of resources that the Confederacy possessed as they struggled to maintain any kind of stability within its economy, the lack of cooperation throughout the South’s military and its inability to make decisions politically that would assist the cause. It was also due to Grant’s ability to build good relationships with many of his generals, particularly Sherman, and the President was key to his success within the war. As the historian T. Harry Williams stated, “There is no difficulty in composing a final evaluation of Ulysses S. Grant. With him there be no balancing and qualifying, no ifs and buts. He won battles and campaigns, and he struck the blow that won the war.” This illustrates that Grant had the character to do what was necessary in order to win the war and took a ‘no nonsense’ approach to his ambition of ending the
As it was assisted by the lack of resources that the Confederacy possessed as they struggled to maintain any kind of stability within its economy, the lack of cooperation throughout the South’s military and its inability to make decisions politically that would assist the cause. It was also due to Grant’s ability to build good relationships with many of his generals, particularly Sherman, and the President was key to his success within the war. As the historian T. Harry Williams stated, “There is no difficulty in composing a final evaluation of Ulysses S. Grant. With him there be no balancing and qualifying, no ifs and buts. He won battles and campaigns, and he struck the blow that won the war.” This illustrates that Grant had the character to do what was necessary in order to win the war and took a ‘no nonsense’ approach to his ambition of ending the