(45)” As before, he replaces the theological role of Adam with the Kingdom of God. We should not contrast ourselves with Adam in order to realize our sins. Not only because this promotes an individualistic and personal understanding of sin which is not conducive to social reform, but also because the perfection that Adam represents is not valid for the social gospel. Theologians, he suggests, learned a conception of perfect from Jesus Christ and super imposed it on Adam. Furthermore, because “Adam’s situation gave very limited opportunities for selfishness, which is the essence of sin,” Adam’s state of being will never give us a contrast by which to measure and be conscious of our social sins (51). As a community, our conception of the Kingdom of God as a “realm of love… and a commonwealth of labour” allows us to comprehend the extent of our social imperfection (54). By replacing Adam with Jesus our understanding of sin must propel us towards action, according to the model of
(45)” As before, he replaces the theological role of Adam with the Kingdom of God. We should not contrast ourselves with Adam in order to realize our sins. Not only because this promotes an individualistic and personal understanding of sin which is not conducive to social reform, but also because the perfection that Adam represents is not valid for the social gospel. Theologians, he suggests, learned a conception of perfect from Jesus Christ and super imposed it on Adam. Furthermore, because “Adam’s situation gave very limited opportunities for selfishness, which is the essence of sin,” Adam’s state of being will never give us a contrast by which to measure and be conscious of our social sins (51). As a community, our conception of the Kingdom of God as a “realm of love… and a commonwealth of labour” allows us to comprehend the extent of our social imperfection (54). By replacing Adam with Jesus our understanding of sin must propel us towards action, according to the model of