Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
104 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Judicial Review
|
The power of a court to refuse to enforce a law or government regulation that in the opinion of the judges conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or, in a state court, the state constitution
|
|
Adversary System
|
A judicial system in which the court of law is a neutral arena where two parties argue the differences
|
|
Difference between Criminal Law and Civil Law
|
Criminal: Law that defines crime against the public order and provides for punishment.
Civil: Law that governs the relations between individuals and defines their legal rights. |
|
Federalist #78
|
written by Alexander Hamilton; talks about the federal judiciary; judiciary must depend on other two branches to uphold its decisions
|
|
Plea Bargain
|
Agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant that the defendant will plead guilty to a lesser offense to avoid having to stand trial for a more serious offense.
|
|
Public Defender System
|
Arrangement whereby public officials are hired to provide legal assistance to people accused of crimes whoa re unable to hire their own attorneys
|
|
Defendant
|
In a criminal action, the person or party accused of an offense.
|
|
Original Jurisdiction
|
The authority of a court to hear a case " in the first instance"
|
|
Apellate Jurisdiction
|
The authority of a court to review decisions made by lower courts
|
|
Stare Decisis
|
The rule of precedent, whereby a rule or law contained in a judicial decision is commonly viewed as binding on judges whenever the same question is presented.
|
|
District Courts
|
In the federal courts, trials are held in in what are called District Courts and appeals are to the Courts of Appeals, and then to the US Supreme Court.
|
|
Apellate Courts
|
Appeals are to the Courts of Appeals, and then to the US Supreme Court.
|
|
Writ of Habeas Corpus
|
A court order requiring explanation to a judge why a prisoner is being held in custody
|
|
Supreme Court justices and their Ideologies
|
Their Ideologies usually correspond with the President that appointed them
|
|
4 Factors used for federal judge appointment by president
|
Political Party, Race/Gender, Experience, Liberal/Conservative
|
|
Senatorial Courtesy
|
Presidential custom of submitting the names of prospective appointees for approval to senators form the states in which the appointees are to work.
|
|
Senate Judiciary Committee
|
A Senate committee, charged, among other things, with recommending for or against presidential appointees to the federal courts.
|
|
Recess Appointments
|
Presidential appointment made without Senate confirmation during Senate recess
|
|
Litmus Test
|
An examination of the political ideology of a nominated judge.
|
|
"borking"
|
to attack (a candidate or public figure) systematically, especially in the media
|
|
People For the American Way & Heritage Foundation
|
is a modern liberal progressive advocacy group in the United States.
|
|
Judicial Restraint
|
Philosophy proposing that judges should interpret the Constitution to reflect what the framers intended and what its words literally say.
|
|
Judicial Activism
|
Philosophy proposing that judges should interpret the Constitution to reflect current conditions and values.
|
|
"packing the courts"
|
Prestidents chooseing judges with similar ideology.
|
|
Litigation
|
To engage in legal proceedings.
|
|
What isssues have congress changed jurisdiction over
|
The Supreme Courts original jurisdiction can only be changed by Constitutional Amendment; however, Congress can engage in jurisdictional stripping over certain types of appellate matters through
|
|
Writ of Certiorari
|
An order by the Court directing a lower court to send up the record of the case for review.
|
|
Dickenson v. U.S.
|
Two reporters violated a judges order not to publish testimony in a murder conspiracy case in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Importance: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declared that an injunction must be obeyed, regardless of the ultimate validity of the court order. |
|
Miranda v. Arizona
|
1966 ruling that upon arrest, a suspect has the right to remain silent and the right to consult with a lawyer.
|
|
2 roads to the Supreme Court
|
The Rule of Four and Apellate Court
|
|
Rule of Four
|
an unwritten rule that requires at least four justices to agree that a case warrants consideration before it is reviewed by the Supreme Court.
|
|
Amicus Curiae Brief
|
Where interests groups are concerned with the outcome of the case and they can file a brief
|
|
US. v. Lopez
|
Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress authority to regulate interstate commerce. The law is a criminal statute that has nothing to do with "commerce" or any sort of economic activity.
|
|
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
|
was a United States Supreme Court decision on July 3, 1989 upholding a Missouri law that imposed restrictions on the use of state funds, facilities, and employees in performing, assisting with, or counseling on abortions. The Supreme Court in Webster allowed for states to legislate in an area that had previously been thought to be forbidden under Roe v. Wade.
|
|
3 types of opinions
|
The three types of opinions most people are familiar with are: Majority (usually called the "opinion of the Court")Concurring (agreeing)Dissenting (disagreeing)
|
|
Bush v. Gore
|
is the United States Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election.
|
|
Hmadan v. Rumsfeld
|
is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay lack "the power to proceed because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949."Specifically, the ruling says that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions was violated
|
|
Signing Statements
|
is a written pronouncement issued by the President of the United States upon the signing of a bill into law.
|
|
Ex Post Facto law
|
Retroactive criminal law that works to the disadvantage of an individual; forbidden in the Constitution
|
|
Bill of Attainer
|
Legislative act inflicting punishment, including deprivation of property, without a trial, on named individuals or members of a specific group
|
|
Due Process Clause
|
Clause in the Fifth Amendment limiting the power of the national government; similar clause in the Fourteenth Amendment prohibiting state governments from depriving any person life, liberty or property without due process of law
|
|
Selective Incorporation
|
The process by which provisions of the Bill of Rights are brought within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applied to state and local governments.
|
|
New Judicial Federalism
|
refers to the increased reliance of state courts of last resort on state constitutions rather than on the federal Constitution for the protection of individual rights.
|
|
Difference between Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause
|
Free Exercise: the First Amendment guarantee that citizens may freely engage in the religious activities of their choice
Establishment Clause: Clause in the First Amendment that states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. |
|
Faith Based Initiative
|
community based actions that are vbalued and essential partners to assist Americans in need
Federal Government Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives |
|
Lemon v. Kurtzman
|
as a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Pennsylvanias 1968 Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act , which allowed the state Superintendent of Public Instruction to reimburse nonpublic schools (most of which were Catholic) for the salaries of teachers who taught secular material in these nonpublic schools, secular textbooks and secular instructional materials, violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
|
|
Engle v. Vitale
|
was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that ruled it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools.
|
|
"Intellgent Design"
|
is a form of creationism[1][2][3] presented by its proponents as a theory that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[
|
|
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
|
was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that tested the allowance of school vouchers in relation to the First Amendments Establishment Clause.
|
|
Employment Division v. Smith
|
is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.
|
|
Symbolic Speech
|
is a legal term in United States law used to describe actions that purposefully and discernibly convey a particular message or statement to those viewing it. Symbolic speech is recognized as being protected under the First Amendment as a form of speech, but this is not expressly written as such in the document.
|
|
Bad Tendency Test
|
Interpretation of the First Amendment that would permit legislatures to forbid speech encouraging people to engage in illegal action.
|
|
Clear and Present Danger Test
|
Interpretation of the First Amendment that holds that the government cannot interfere with speech unless the speech presents a clear and present danger that it will lead to evil or illegal acts. To shout "Fire"falsely in a crowded theater is Justice Oliver Wendell Holmess famous example.
|
|
Preferred Position Test
|
Interpretation of the First Amendment that holds that freedom of expression is so essential to democracy that governments should not punish persons for what they say, only for what they do.
|
|
Libel and Slander
|
Written defamation of another person. Especially in the case of public officials and public figures, the constitutional tests designed to restrict libel actions are very rigid.
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a persons reputation. |
|
Sedition
|
Attempting to overthrow the government by force or to interrupt its activities by violence.
|
|
Miller v. California
|
was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision wherein the court redefined its definition of obscenity from that of “utterly without socially redeeming value” to that that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
|
|
Fighting Words
|
Words that by their very nature inflict injury on those to whom they are addressed or incite them to acts of violence.
|
|
Prioir Restraint
|
Censorship imposed before a speech is made or a newspaper is published
|
|
Freedom of Infomation Act
|
is a federal freedom of information law that allows for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States government.
|
|
Shield Laws
|
A shield law is legislation designed to protect reporters privilege, or the right of news reporters to refuse to testify as to information and/or sources of information obtained during the news gathering and dissemination process.
|
|
Telecomunications Act of 1996
|
was the first significant overhaul of United States telecommunications law in more than sixty years, amending the Communications Act of 1934. The Act, signed by President Bill Clinton, represented a major change in American telecommunication law, since it was the first time that the Internet was included in broadcasting and spectrum allotment
|
|
Reno v. ACLU
|
is a United States Supreme Court case in which all nine Justices of the Court voted to strike down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), because they violated the First Amendments guarantee of freedom of speech.
|
|
Function of Federal Communications Commission
|
The commission is organized into bureaus and offices, based on function (see also Organizational Charts of the FCC). Bureau and office staff members regularly share expertise to cooperatively fulfill responsibilities such as: Developing and implementing regulatory programs.
|
|
Naturalization
|
A legal action conferring citizenship on an alien.
|
|
Dual Citizenship and Expatriation
|
Citizenship in more than one nation.
The right to renounce ones citizenship |
|
Slaughterhouse Case
|
the 5th and 14th amendments do not guarantee federal protection of individual rights of all citizens of the United States against discrimination by their own state governments; made a distinction between state citizenship and national citizenship
|
|
Contract Clause
|
prohibits states from enacting any law that retroactively impairs contract rights. The Contract Clause applies only to state legislation, not court decisions.
|
|
Police Powers
|
Inherent powers of state governments to pass laws to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; the national government has no directly granted police powers but accomplishes the same goals through other delegated powers/
|
|
Eminent Domain
|
Power of a government to take private property for public use; the U.S. Constitution gives national and state governments this power and requires them to provide just compensation for property so taken.
|
|
Regulatory Taking
|
is a situation in which a government regulates a property to such a degree that the regulation effectively amounts to an exercise of the governments eminent domain power without actually divesting the property's owner of title to the property.
|
|
Procedural Due Process
|
Principle required by the Constitution that when the state or federal government acts in such a way that denies a citizen of a life, liberty, or property interest, the person must first be given notice and the opportunity to be heard.
|
|
Substantive Due Process
|
Constitutional requirement that governments act reasonably and that the substance of the laws themselves be fair and reasonable; limits what a government may do.
|
|
USA Patriot Act
|
is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes
|
|
Partial Birth Abortion
|
is a United States law prohibiting a form of late-term abortion that the Act calls "partial-birth abortion", referred to in medical literature as intact dilation and extraction.
|
|
Casey (Undue Burden"
|
was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the constitutionality of several Pennsylvania state regulations regarding abortion were challenged. The Courts plurality opinion upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion and altered the standards for analyzing restrictions of that right, invalidating one regulation but upholding the other four.
|
|
Romer v. Evans
|
is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with sexual orientation and state laws. It was the first Supreme Court case to address gay rights since Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), when the Court had held that laws criminalizing sodomy were constitutional.[1]
|
|
5 Senses Cannot Commit a Trespass
|
Evidence cannot be introduced into trial if it was not constitutionally obtained.
|
|
F.I.S.A.
|
is a United States federal law which prescribes procedures for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers
|
|
Exclusionary Rule
|
Evidence cannot be introduced into trial if it was not constitutionally obtained.
|
|
Leon and Nix Cases
|
See Exclusionary Rule
|
|
Miranda Decision
|
A decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning the rights of persons in police custody. The Court ruled that, before questioning by the police, suspects must be informed that they have the right to remain silent and the right to consult an attorney, and that anything they say may be used against them in court.
|
|
Difference between Grand Jury and Petit Jury
|
Petit: A jury of 6 to 12 persons who determine guilt or innocence in a civil or criminal action.
Grand: A jury of 12 to 23 persons who, in private, hear evidence presented by the government to determine whether persons shall be required to stand trial |
|
Indictment, Arraignment, and Trial by Jury
|
Indictment: is a formal accusation that a person has committed a crime.
Arraignment: is a formal reading of a criminal charging document in the presence of the defendant to inform the defendant of the charges against him or her. Trial by Jury: legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision or makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. |
|
Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia
|
reaffirmed the United States Supreme Courts acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg.
|
|
Double Jeopardy
|
Trial or punishment for the same crime by the same government; forbidden by the Constitution
|
|
Difference between Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
|
Civil rights is concentrated on the basic equality of treatment of people regardless of race, gender, etc. Civil liberties, on the other hand, includes a more vast freedom which includes freedom of speech, right to privacy, etc.
|
|
Natural Rights
|
those not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable.
|
|
3 Classification Tests (Rational, Suspect, and Quasi-Suspect)
|
3 Different Tests
|
|
San Antonio v. Rodriguez
|
was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held the San Antonio Independent School Districts financing system, based on local property taxes, was not an unconstitutional violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
|
|
Education Amendment
|
Title IX , a portion
|
|
Civil Rights Act of 1964
|
act that prohibited the use of any registration requirement that resulted in discrimination and paved the way for the involvement of the federal government to enforce the law.
|
|
Civil Rights Act of 1968
|
this law banned discrimination in housing, the segregation of education, transportation, and employment, it helped African Americans gain their full voting rights.
|
|
Voting Rights Act of 1965
|
authorized the use of federal agents to enforce African Americans right to register and vote.
|
|
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1991
|
act that required employers, schools, and public buildings to reasonably accommodate the physical needs of handicapped individuals by providing such things as ramps and elevators with appropriate facilities.
|
|
Glass Ceiling
|
is a political term used to describe "the unseen, yet unbreakable barrier that keeps minorities and women from rising to the upper rungs of the corporate ladder, regardless of their qualifications or achievements."
|
|
3 Ways to disenfranchise blacks
|
The Jim Crow laws had two goals; to keep African-American separate from whites and to keep them from obtaining political power. The latter was done through the use of the poll tax, grandfather clause and literacy tests.
|
|
Difference between De Jure and De Facto Segregation
|
de jure segregation is segregation imposed by law (de jure is latin for lawful) de facto segregation is segregation by fact or circumstance.
|
|
Class Action Suit
|
Lawsuit brought by an individual or a group of people on behalf of all those similarly situated.
|
|
Restrictive Covenant
|
A provision in a deed to real property prohibiting its sale to a person of a particular race or religion. Judicial enforcement of such deeds is unconstitutional.
|
|
Bakke Case (1971)
|
A 1978 Supreme Court decision holding that a state university could not admit less qualified individuals solely because of their race.
|
|
Croson and Adarand Cases
|
affirmative action plans must be jusged by the strict scrutiny standard that requires any race-conscious plan to be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest
|
|
Californias Proposition 209
|
is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit public institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity.The initiative was opposed by affirmative action advocates and supporters. Proposition 209 was voted into law on 5 November 1996, with 54 percent of the votes. In the November 2006 election in Michigan, a similar amendment was passed, entitled the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative.
|
|
Gratz and Grutter v. Bolinger (2003)
|
Gratz vs. Bollinger was a ruling that stated adding points due to race in the university admission point system was unconstitutional. The ruling was against the University of Michigans undergraduate admission. Grutter vs. Bollinger was a ruling that upheld the Gratz vs. Bollinger ruling. Violated the Equal Protection Clause.
|