• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Energy budget

incidence energy, from sun,


is the balance of what goes in and what goes out


about 25% is absorbed, 75% reflected back to space, changing the 23 % leads to climate change

Milankovitch Cycle

eccentricity: shape of orbit


obliquity: tilt of earth's axis


Precession: earths wobble


this three parameters change with time leads to climate change


glacial and interglacial cycles

greenhouse effect

gases in atmosphere absorb infrared light


Jean Fourier , basic physics


Arrhenius , provided first temp estimates


CO2 accounts for only 50% of greenhouse effect


rest s from methane and freon traces


average temp on earth is getting hotter


methane is much more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2


methane is mostly frozen , raising temp !


Local climate change is not predictable

temp future projections


IPCC

what parameters go into models, anthropogenic and natural forces


CO2 emissions , future Co2 projections based on human useage of fossil fuels


EMISSIONS based on human behavior

biology of climate change

increase co2 , affects physiological, phenology, distribution of species , in turn affects species interactions and in turn affects extinction , speciation, composition of communities will be very different , change in biota



Changes in Phenology

study of temporal aspects of natural recurrent phenomenom and their relation to climate


egg-laying,


flowering, leaf fall


hibernation


transition from larvae to adult


migration


not record for phenology, it is an obervation


phenologies of some temperate species is controled by photoperiod (length of day) not changed by temp change.

Consequences of changing phenology

Anerican robin, winter temp change , shortens ,


migrate to breeding ground early ,


temps in northen latitudes are changing at different rates than lower latitudes





Disrupted Synchrony

mismatching in timing of phenological shifts can disrupt species interactions


in early winter moth mates female lays eggs


eggs have diapause, hatch in Feb , if hatch too early, caterpillars will starve , if after bud burst less eatable leaves are available





Environmental Sex Determination

reptiles, female lay eggs, temp determine sex, sex ratio is dependent on temp


tuatara= as temp gets hotter, more females, leading to decline of population

Species Range Shifts


response to high temp

range moves north , to higher latitudes


different species moves at different rates. but not all species shifts.


changes , local extinction- recolonization



Altitudinal Changes

fossil pollen, sheep ranges of nevada


small mammals in Yosemite


species range contracts upward with high temp


each species range shift is individualistic


based on physiolocial changes

CLementian Model


Clements


Community level changes

community level changes


clements , ecologist, argued that when climate changes the community they respond in a cohesive manner


communities of super organisms that respond cohesively



Gleasonian Model

species respond individualistic to climate change. communities represent a shared tolerance that happen to intersect at a given time


they respond to climate change based on their physiology, biology,


shifts are individualistic


communities are reshuffled



taking mud core



sample mud seperate pollen , identify and count


gives you relative abundance of species at that time , carbon dating dates the core + sample




corroborates Gleason model


the green sahara hypothesis

if you go back 6,000 years ago


lush vegetative place


supported by climate model


it was wet and lush , no desert


also supported by rock art , people diving into water



effects of future warming


models

use enivironmental distributions of species


and their physiology to predict new distributions under climatic conditions


advantages


can use for any species( climate Envelope)


max temp min temp, it can exist


then apply new scenario to climate envelope


all you need is range map and environmental data


disadvantages


data limitations: except for few species, no god data for range map, climate envelope will not be accurate


too simple: we do not know physiology for all species


assumes no adaptation of species


some species have been shown to adapt

effects of future warming


experiments

micro and mesocosm


are restricted to plant communities, hard to tract animals,


:heat things up , pump CO2 into canopy,


changes in soil to communities


changes in precipation


advantages :


easy to manipulate, temp co2 nitrogen


test for different combinations of these factors


disadvantages:


logistical constraint , must distribute over small areas over globe


hard to extrapolate, apply results to whole ecosystems


what happens to associated species


GOOD ONLY FOR short lived plants




effects of future warming


empirical approach


observations and tests

comparative approach look at responses over gradients, co2 , temp, nitrogen


based on results you can build statistical models


if you change the temp this way or that you can predict what will happen to species based these historic gradients


adavantages:


large spatial and temporal scales


disadvantages :


nonexperimental


data limitations


hard to seperate environmental change from other anthropegenic change


non analog communties: there is no analog of past communites today , they have obviously changed. and if the current communtiy is unique, statistical model may not be able to predict changes accurately


as we destroy habitats, will there be habitat for species to move into?

Pica Ochotona Princeps

small herbivores, live in very high altitudes,


restricted habitat. may run out of habitat


great basin has extinct populations

Ocean Acidification

oceans absorb CO2


the other CO2 problem


half of anthropogneic CO2 is absorbed by ocean


ph will drop by 0.5untis by 2100


Will cause species with calcified shells to decline, they will not be able to grow, precipitate their exoskeletons


pH is not stable across ocean, why ?


pH not same across ocean because of upwelling , cold water tend to be lower in pH


how does changing chem in ocean affect animals



Tatoosh Island

declining pH of intertidal community


tidepools pH testing, they varied substantially


they tested pH during night and day,


to account for local CO2, net effect the pH is declining


short term microcosm exp.s showed mix results: increased mortality, and reduced calcification , some show increase, while others show no effect

climate change and diseases

new diseases as ranges shift


cholera and el nino


vector diseases,

Cholera

as temp goes up, vibrio cholera, range increases


microbe is sensitive to ocean temp


tight correlation to sea surface temp and cholera outbreaks, as seen by stats

malaria

strong correlation with high precipitation


and incidence occurance


mosquitos range changes also