Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
79 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Pre-modern view as a source of everyday knowledge
|
ancestors assumed that they saw things as they really were. STAY OUT OF THAT TREE OR YOU’LL TURN INTO A TOAD! A dandelion cannot be beautiful or hideous; it has to be one or the other.
|
|
Modern view as a source of everyday knowledge
|
a dandelion is simply a dandelion. It is a plant with yellow petals and green leaves.
|
|
Postmodern view as a source of everyday knowledge
|
spirits don’t exist. Dandelion does not exist. There is no answer to “what does the book really look like?” All we can offer is the different ways it looks from different points of view.
|
|
Theory and social science
|
deals with the logical aspects of science; providing systematic explanations.
|
|
Data analysis and social science
|
looks for patterns in observations and compares what is logically expected with what is actually observed.
|
|
Social scientists are interested in
|
explaining human totalness
|
|
Gender is a______ whereas male and female are its ______
|
Variable and attributes
|
|
Three major purposes of social research
|
exploration; description; and explanation.
|
|
Ethical issues may rule out
|
certain research procedures
|
|
Nomothetic explanations present
|
a generalized understanding of many cases
|
|
Idiographic explanations present
|
specific cases fully
|
|
We learn about probability and cause and effect. Desire for prediction
|
but can we understand the results? Why is college worth your time? Lucky streaks?
|
|
You come to class; take notes; take an exam; this routine is the way it is because of
|
tradition
|
|
What is the drawback of tradition
|
resistance of doing things a different way. Can make people less likely to look for better ways to do or learn things. Can make us resistant to new ideas.
|
|
What are the limitations of depending on authority
|
they can be wrong too. Hitler and the Nazi party; he was wrong.
|
|
We have one experience and we turn it into a general rule is called
|
overgeneralizing.
|
|
We reinforce what we already know (or think we do) is called
|
inaccurate and accurate observations. Liberal parents may not watch FOX news.
|
|
Some of the problems with non scientific beliefs are
|
based on limited knowledge; tend to believe what is in our own minds is the truth; intuitive thinking (it just makes sense); cognitive consistency (we go with things are that consistent with our beliefs); authorities can make mistakes; times and conditions may change so thinking has t be self correcting
|
|
So what is "real"
|
we live in a state of naivety most of the time. We don't think that the chair we sit in is made up of atoms and polymers and etc.
|
|
What is universal and what is relative in human experience is known as
|
perspective
|
|
Observable patterns in social behavior are called
|
social regularities. Not often trivial. Exceptions often do prove the rule.
|
|
Law of parsimony
|
keeping it simple. What can we throw out and still explain what we're seeing?
|
|
Replication
|
can what you've seen be seen by someone else? Major strength of science- self correcting
|
|
Generalizability
|
does our study have meaning in another context?
|
|
Paradigms
|
points from which to view. Provide ways of looking at life and are grounded in sets of assumptions about the nature of reality.
|
|
Theories are
|
sets of interrelated statements to explain aspect of social life. Flesh out and specify paradigms. Explains what we see.
|
|
Laws
|
universal generalizations about classes of facts. Law of gravity
|
|
Concepts
|
basic building blocks of theory. Abstract elements representing classes of phenomena within the field of study.
|
|
Peer group
|
people who you hang around with and identify with
|
|
Variable
|
comprises a set of attributes
|
|
Axioms/postulates
|
fundamental principle, taken to be true, on which a theory is grounded.
|
|
Propositions
|
specific conclusions derived from axiomatic groundwork
|
|
Hypothesis
|
specified testable expectation about empirical reality that follows from a more general proposition.
|
|
Numbers hold symbolic value
|
articulate identity or to justify or oppose military intervention
|
|
Instrumental value
|
plan for needed social services
|
|
Numbers are often posed as truth
|
asserted as evidence to support particular arguments.
|
|
The way we interpret and make sense of numbers depends on
|
the context in which we live
|
|
Numerical literacy
|
able to criqiue and make thoughtful decisions
|
|
Numbers serve to
|
communicate authority and to establish legitimacy
|
|
We can use numbers in research without assuming
|
that they represent an objective reality superior to other ways of understanding our world.
|
|
Premise of quantitative empirical investigation
|
created data should be seen as equivalent across research subjects.
|
|
Intrinsic value
|
number seventeen has no meaning in isolation.
|
|
Theories flesh out
|
paradigms. They are how we explain the world around us...limited by the worldview in play..
|
|
Hypotheses
|
a testator question that fleshes out theory. .
|
|
Deduction
|
theory to observation. Start with a problem or question. Is TV viewing related to stereotyping? When we Know a lot about the subject.
|
|
Induction
|
observation to generalization. Used when there is not a lot of prior research done on topic
|
|
What two values can numbers have
|
Symbolic value....used to justify a course of action and Instrumental value as an aid to planning.
|
|
Value of numbers is determined by
|
our codes of communication and our methods for evaluating research.
|
|
numbers as subjective accounts
|
when there are discrepancies between numbers and counts the possibility of perspective arises
|
|
numbers as interconnecting realities
|
where the meaning, value, and significance of numbers are negotiated through communication
|
|
numbers as objective truths
|
facts not to be questioned
|
|
Numbers can be collected and statistically presented reflect the interests of an
|
institution..business..or similar entities. .
|
|
A society that possesses numerical value knows how to
|
critique research
|
|
Example of zadroga bill
|
Instrumental value: numbers help lawmakers and health workers calculate what funds will be needed to cover the health costs of first responders.
Symbolic value: numbers represent the further extent of loss on 9/11 |
|
2010 census as an example
|
the value of being counted. Instrumental value of this is to improve the country and meet demands in areas where the population may have increased. It means to symbolically represented in America's society. .
|
|
What kinds of research gets done is affected by
|
funding and funding priorities...institutional review boards....research trends or emphases at the time.
|
|
Evaluating reported research: who produced the research
|
researchers home institutions..funding agencies...permission...granting institutions (IRB...research sites). .
|
|
Evaluating reported research: what was the purpose of the research
|
academic...evaluative...commercial...theoretical. What were the research questions and hypothesis? What contribution does the research make? .
|
|
Evaluating reported research: who participated in the research
|
how were people included or excluded? Study size?.
|
|
Primary responsibilities of researchers
|
accuracy and adhering to regulations about research .
|
|
Accuracy
|
only report what you've found...take steps to correct mistakes if they have been published...allow replication of results .
|
|
Nuremberg code
|
holocaust doctors experimenting on Jews...present day doctors looked through the records to see if they could use some of the information obtained from the previous experiments.
|
|
Tuskegee syphilis experiment
|
brave group of veterans from WWII that came back from war with syphilis...soon penicillin was cure for syphilis...treatment was withheld from them to see if black men died differently from this disease than white men.
|
|
Mil gram experiment
|
how did regular Germans get caught up in the killings in WWII? Electric shocks to see how far regular people will go to go with what they were being told to do. Problem because the person being researched was put under great stress. Shift in research ethics in 1990s
|
|
Ethical issue: voluntary participation
|
people can't be coerced into participating in research. Subjects have to be free to leave without fear of retribution. Rewards or incentives can be ethical.
|
|
Informed Consent
|
prospective research participants must be fully informed about the procedures and risks involved in research before consenting to participate
|
|
Do No Harm
|
participants should not be at risk of harm as a result of participating
|
|
right to privacy
|
confidentiality vs anonymity
|
|
deceptions studies permitted during
|
medical studies and conformity studies
|
|
debriefing
|
ensure that participants leave the research project with at least as much self-esteem and low anxiety that they came with
|
|
Accuracy
|
only report what you've found. Take steps to correct mistakes if they have been published. Allow replication of results.
|
|
Informed consent must include
|
purpose of research and expected duration and included procedures.
|
|
Confidentiality
|
participants are as sued that identifying information will not be shared with anyone but other researchers involved in the study.
|
|
Anonymity
|
participant will remain anonymous throughout study-even to the researcher.
|
|
How do we ensure that researchers take the needs of participants into consideration
|
institutional review boards.
|
|
Purpose of IRB
|
determine risk in study...monitor informed consent and voluntary participation.
|
|
IRB and specially protected groups
|
children...adults not competent to consent...immigrants...employees or students...pregnant women...prisoners.
|
|
When do you not need informed consent
|
when research is not reasonably expected to cause distress or harm...the study involves normal observation of public behavior.
|
|
Deception studies
|
can only be conducted if this is the only justifiable way to conduct the study. Can't be used to cause physical or psychological pain. Must be explained asap. Participants can withdraw once debriefed.
|