• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

An auditor issued an audit report that was dual dated for a subsequent event occurring after the completion of field work but before issuance of the auditor’s report. The auditor’s responsibility for events occurring subsequent to the completion of field work was:

limited to the specific event referenced.


After issuing a report an auditor concludes that an auditing procedure considered necessary at the time of the audit was omitted from the audit. The auditor should first:

assess the importance of the omitted procedure to the auditor’s ability to support the opinion expressed on the financial statements taken as a whole.

Jones, CPA, audited the 1993 financial statements of Ray Corp. and issued an unqualified opinion on March 10, 1994. On April 2, 1994, Jones became aware of a 1993 transaction that may materially affect the 1993 financial statements. This transaction would have been investigated had it come to Jones’ attention during the course of the audit. Jones should:

contact Ray’s management and request their cooperation in investigating the matter.