• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Freedom of speech

Barron v. Baltimore

Bill of Rights only applies to federal government

Palko v. Connecticut

Double Jeopardy

Engel v. Vitak

Establishment of Religion

Abbington School District v. Schempp

Free exercise and establishment of religion

Mapp v. Ohio

4th Amendment- No unreasonable search and seizure

Gideon v. Wainwright

6th amendment- right to an attorney

Griswold v. Connecticut

1st, 3rd, 4th, and 9th amendments- privacy rights for married couples to have abortions and planned parenthood

Roe v. Wade

14th- via Griswold case- abortion

Miranda v. Arizona

Notification of rights

Schenck v. United States

Clear and Present Danger Test- exception to freedom of speech, clear and present danger, cause panic

Near v. Minnesota

Freedom of Press- protects newspapers from prior restraint

New York Times v. Sullivan

Public figures have less protection from what can be said about them... they need to prove it was written with malice or with knowledge that the words were false

LA v. Robinson

Obscenity is to be judged by the average person in a contemporary community standard

Miller v. California

Miller Test- Obscene material cannot be sent out to public via mail

Tinker v. Des Moines

Political armbands were allowed in schools despite dress code because it didn't prevent learning, it encouraged people to talk about the Vietnam war at the time

Texas v. Johnson

Flag burning is legal, at local level Texas put the person in jail, incorporation of freedom of expression

Lemon v. Kurtzman

Lemon Test- Government involvement in religion is constitutional only if funding is not for religious purposes, the government does not inhibit or advance the religion, and the government is not involved with a religion

District of Colombia v. Heller

Right to own gun for lawful purposes such as defending oneself, is not incorporated, this applies to Washington DC only

McDonald v. Chicago

Incorporates 2nd amendment

U.S. v. Jones

Search warrants are necessary for GPS tracking of vehicles

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Standards for regulating abortions from strict scrutiny of any restraints on fundamental rights towards abortion to one of undue burden on women

Gregg v. Georgia

Death penalty is not cruel and unusual

Korematsu v. United States

Race-based restrictions toward Japanese Americans after bombing of Pearl Harbor. They were not allowed in large areas of the country near the Pacific Ocean. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, and Korematsu lost the case

Plessy v. Ferguson

Separate but equal doctrine, 1/9 black man bought first class ticket on train, was denied seat, had to go to black section, brought case to Supreme Court, lost

Slaughterhouse Cases

First opportunity to use 14th amendment to limit state power, interpreted the privileges and immunities clause, did not work

Benton v. Maryland

Protection against double jeopardy

McCleskey v. Kemp

Death penalty does not violate the 14th amendment (Equal Protection of Laws) because juries were not convicting Capital punishment solely on the basis of race

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Gave $ to families to pay for tuition for private religious schools

Roth v. United States

Obscenity is not within the boundaries of free speech or press

NAACP v. Alabama

Freedom of assembly includes the state cannot require member list from associations

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily

Police could use pictures from newspaper to make arrest without violating the freedom of press