Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
131 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Elements of Crimes
|
Physical Act
Mental State Causation Concurrence |
|
Criminal Defenses |
Self-Defense, Duress, Entrapment, necessity , mistake |
|
Jurisdiction - Criminal Law
|
Any place where act that was part of the crime took place OR the result took place
|
|
Burden of Proof
|
Elements = P Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
Defenses = Prosecution (after D raises) Beyond a Reasonable Doubt - Exception = insanity defense on D |
|
Physical Act Requirement
|
Voluntary bodily movement (i.e. not a convulsion, unconscious, reflex, etc.)
|
|
Omissions Rule - Criminal Liability for Failure to Act
|
DKA - Duty, Knowledge, Ability
- Legal Duty (SCRAP) - Statute (tax returns, abuse) - Contract - Relationship - Assumption of duty/rescue - Created the Peril |
|
Physical Act Requirement - Possession |
M/h control for a period of time such that there is opportunity to terminate possession |
|
Common Law Mental States
|
Specific Intent = desire to do the act and to achieve a specific result
General Intent = intent inferred from the doing of the act Malice = intentionally or reckless disregard of obvious known risk Strict Liability = no mental state |
|
Specific Intent Crimes
|
Assualt
Attempt Burglary Conspiracy Embezzlement False Pretenses First Degree Murder Forgery Larceny Robbery Solicitation |
|
General Intent Crimes
|
Battery
False Imprisonment Forcible Rape Kidnapping |
|
Malice Crimes
|
Murder
Arson |
|
Strict Liability Crimes
|
Public Welfare Offenses
Statutory Rape |
|
CL Defense - Mistake of Law
|
Never a defense u/l statute makes knowledge of the law an element of the crime
|
|
CL Defense - Mistake of Fact
|
Specific Intent = any mistake is a defense
General Intent = only reasonable mistake is a defense Malice = only reasonable mistake is a defense SL = never a defense |
|
Model Penal Code - Mental States
|
Purposely = D's conscious objective to accomplish a particular result
Knowingly = D is aware of his acts Recklessly = D was aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk AND disregarded it consciously Negligently = D s/h/k of substantial and unjustifiable risk Strict Liability = no mental state |
|
MPC Defense - Mistake of Fact and Law
|
Mistake of Law NEVER a defense
Mistakes of Fact - Purpose, Knowing, Reckless = any mistake is a defense - Negligent = only reasonable mistake is a defense |
|
Crimes - Causation Requirement
|
Actual and Proximate Causation
|
|
Actual Causation
|
But For Causation = bad result w/n/h happened "but for" D's conduct
Includes accelerating causes! |
|
Proximate Causation |
D is a PC if the bad result is a natural and probable consequence of his conduct (includes Vs w/ pre-existing weaknesses and intervening things like medical malpractice) |
|
Concurrence Requirement
|
D M/h mental state at the same time she engages in the act
|
|
Common Law Battery
|
General Intent
Unlawful application of force to another resulting in bodily injury OR offensive touching |
|
Common Law Assault
|
Specific Intent
Intentional creation by more than mere words of a reasonable fear in V's mind of imminent bodily harm (fake punch!) |
|
Statutory Aggravated Assault and Battery
|
Requires use of a weapon, that V is a child, elderly, disabled or other such vulnerable person, OR intent is to commit robbery or rape.
|
|
Homicide - Year and a Day Rule
|
CL = death M/occur w/in 1y +1d of the homicidal act
MPC (majority) = death c/occur at any time |
|
Common Law Murder
|
Malice Mental State
Causing the death of another person (not unborn fetuses) w/ Malice Aforethought - Intent to kill - Intent to inflict great bodily harm - Extreme recklessness / depraved heart - Felony Murder |
|
Deadly Weapon Rule
|
Use of a deadly weapon creates inference of intent to kill (malice aforethought)
|
|
Transferred Intent
|
If D intends to harm V1 but accidentally harms V2, her intent transfers
- Does NOT apply to attempt - only completed crimes |
|
First and Second Degree Murder
|
Any killing committed w/ premeditation AND deliberation (cool, calm)
Second Degree = all other murders except FM |
|
Voluntary Manslaughter
|
Intentional killing committed in the heat of passion after adequate provocation (no cooling off, would arouse sudden and intense passion in the mind of an ordinary person)
Adequate Provocation = serious assault or battery, finding spouse in bed w/ another... M/b more than words! |
|
Involuntary Manslaughter
|
Killing committed w/ criminal negligence OR during a non-felony crime
|
|
CL Felony Murder
|
Any killing during the commission of or attempt to commit a felony
- First Degree = during rape, arson, kidnapping - Second Degree = any other felony |
|
CL Felony Murder - Limitations
|
D M/b guilty of underlying Felony
Felony M/b inherently dangerous, separate from the killing itself (i.e. c/n include aggravated battery) Killing M/b during felony or immediate flight therefrom, and in furtherance of it Death M/b foreseeable V c/n/b a co-felon! |
|
CL Felony Murder - Vicarious Liability
|
All co-felons guilty of a death caused by one co-felon, even if a bystander did the actual killing
|
|
MPC Murder
|
Intent to kill (premeditation and deliberation unnecessary)
Extreme Recklessness Felony Murder |
|
MPC Felony Murder
|
Limited to BRAKES
- Burglary - Robbery - Arson - Kidnapping - Escape from custody - Sexual Assault |
|
MPC Manslaughter
|
Intentional = committed under influence of reasonable extreme emotional disturbance
Unintentional = reckless killing where D is aware of AND consciously disregards substantial and unjustifiable risk of death |
|
MPC Criminally Negligent Homicide
|
Negligence Mental State
D s/h/k of substantial and unjustifiable risk of death |
|
False Imprisonment
|
General Intent
Unlawful confinement of a person w/o her consent |
|
Kidnapping
|
General Intent
False imprisonment involving either moving V or concealing her in a secret place |
|
Aggravated Kidnapping
|
Generally requires purpose to collect ransom, commit robbery or rape, OR where V is a child
|
|
Forcible Rape
|
General Intent
Sex w/o V's consent accomplished by force, threat of force, OR while V is unconscious |
|
Statutory Rape
|
Strict Liability
Sex w/ someone under the age of consent MPC/Minority = reasonable mistake as to age c/b a defense |
|
CL Larceny
|
Trespassory taking and carrying away of another's personal property w/ intent to permanently deprive of rightful possession
C/n/b guilty of larceny if it's valid possession or if D erroneously thought the property was his |
|
CL Larceny - Continuing Trespass
|
If D wrongfully takes PP w/o intent to steal but later forms intent to steal, D w/b guilty of larceny.
|
|
CL Embezzlement
|
Specific Intent
Conversion of another's PP by D already in lawful possession w/ intent to defraud - possession requires authority to exercise some discretion over the property - guilty u/l D intends to return property in exact form |
|
CL False Pretenses
|
Specific Intent
Obtaining title to another's PP by intentional false statement w/ intent to defraud D gets title here! C/n involve future promise. |
|
CL Larceny by Trick
|
D obtains only possession as result of intentional false statement
|
|
CL Robbery
|
Specific Intent
Larceny from another's person or presence (V's vicinity or house while she's in it) by force or threat of immediate injury |
|
Statutory Consolidation of Theft Crimes
|
MPC and most states = consolidate larceny, embezzlement, false pretense, larceny by trick into Theft/Larceny w/ grading as to serious of the offense (due to value of property stolen)
|
|
Receipt/Possession of Stolen Property
|
Knowledge Mental State
Receiving possession of stolen property w/ knowledge that it was stolen |
|
Forgery
|
Specific Intent
Making or altering a writing so that it is false w/ intent to defraud |
|
Uttering
|
Specific Intent
Offering as genuine a forged instrument w/ intent to defraud |
|
Malicious Mischief
|
Malice Mental State
Destroying or damaging someone else's property w/ malice |
|
CL Burglary
|
Breaking and entering another's dwelling at night w/ intent to commit a felony inside (specific intent)
|
|
CL Arson
|
Malicious burning of a building - more than just scorching
|
|
Accomplice Liability
|
Specific Intent
Aids or Encourages principal w/ intent that crime be committed Accomplice w/b guilty of all crimes she aided or encouraged AND other foreseeable crimes committed along w/ the aided crime Remains guilty even if principal is not prosecuted Does NOT include those w/ mere presence, mere knowledge, or a member of a protected class |
|
Accomplices - Withdrawal
|
Encourager M/discourage the crime before it is committed
Aider M/take affirmative steps to neutralize assistance or prevent the crime |
|
CL Accessory After the Fact
|
Requires D to:
- Help principal who has committed a felony - W/knowledge of that the crime h/b committed AND - W/intent to help principal avoid arrest or conviction |
|
Solicitation
|
Specific Intent
Asking someone to commit a crime w/ intent that crime be committed Completion unnecessary - person d/n/h to agree or commit crime |
|
Conspiracy
|
Specific Intent
Agreement b/t 2+ people to commit a crime PLUS overt act in furtherance thereof (i.e. act of preparation) |
|
Conspiracy - One Person?
|
CL = no one person conspiracies
MPC = allows D to be guilty of conspiracy even if all other parties pretended to agree or were acquitted |
|
Conspiracy - Vicarious Liability
|
D is liable for crimes committed by co-conspirators which were in furtherance of the conspiracy's objective AND foreseeable
|
|
Attempt
|
CL = Dangerous Proximity to commission of the crime (needs D and V in same place)
MPC/Majority = conduct that is a Substantial Step towards crime AND strongly corroborative of criminal purpose CANNOT attempt unintentional crimes (reckless, negligent, FM) |
|
Attempt - Impossibility Defense
|
Factual Impossibility = not a defense to attempt
Legal Impossibility = defense to attempt (what D was trying to do was not illegal) |
|
Withdrawal/Renunciation/Abandonment
|
CL = not a defense, but once D w/draws from conspiracy, she is not liable for crimes committed after he left
MPC = defense only if D voluntarily and completely renounced solicitation AND it's based on a change of heart - not fear of being caught |
|
Merger
|
Lesser Included Offenses merge w/ the greater offense (i.e larceny merges w/ robbery, but not burglary)
Conspiracy never merges, but Solicitation and Attempt do. |
|
Insanity Defense
|
D M/h mental disease or defect
M'Naughten = d/n/k act was wrong OR d/n understand nature of act Irresistible Impulse = unable to control actions OR conform conduct to the law Durham Test = product of mental illness MPC = D lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct OR conform conduct to the law |
|
Insanity vs. Incompetence
|
Insanity = at time of crime (not guilty)
Incompetence = at time of trial (w/b postponed until D is competent) |
|
Intoxication Defense
|
Involuntary = defense to any crime, apply insanity tests, but it MUST be completely involuntary
Voluntary = defense to Specific Intent crimes, provided intoxication prevented D from forming necessary intent - NEVER a defense to malice, GI or SL crimes |
|
Common Law Infancy Defense
|
Under 7 - c/n/b prosecuted
Under 14 = rebuttable presumption against prosecution 14 or Older = prosecution allowed |
|
MPC Infancy Defense
|
Under 16 = c/n criminally prosecute - go to juvenile proceedings in family court
16 or 17 = criminal prosecution allowed if juvenile court agrees |
|
Self-Defense
|
Non-Deadly c/b used where it is reasonably necessary to protect against an immediate use of unlawful force
Deadly = m/b used if D faces imminent threat of death or serious injury - Never for defending property u/l inside home to prevent burglary - To protect 3Ps if just as D w/use to protect herself - Note Aggressor and Retreat Rules |
|
Self-Defense - Aggressor Rule
|
D m/n use deadly force where she is the first aggressor
D c/REGAIN right to use deadly force if she w/draws AND communicates that to the other person OR V escalates into a deadly fight |
|
Self-Defense - Retreat Rule
|
Majority = retreat not required
CL = retreat required u/l D is at home, c/n retreat in complete safety OR defending against BRAK. |
|
Self-Defense - Resisting Arrest
|
If D knows or reasonably s/h/k that person performing arrest is a cop
Majority = unlawful arrest allows D to use non-deadly force to resist MPC = no force, even if unlawful arrest, unless arresting officer uses excessive force |
|
Duress Defense
|
If D was forced to commit crime under threat of imminent death or serious injury
- NOT a defense to homicide |
|
Entrapment Defense
|
Where gov't unfairly tempted D to commit crime
- Criminal design M/h originated w/ gov't AND - D was not predisposed to commit the crime |
|
Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure Analysis
|
Gov't conduct?
Did S & S invade an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy? Was search authorized by a valid warrant? Does officer's GF save a defective warrant? Was search warrant properly executed? Is search valid under warrant exceptions? (ESCAPIST) Can P use E obtained in an un-USC S & S against D in court? Is any of P's E Fruit of the Poisonous Tree - and if so, is it admissible? |
|
S & S - Government Conduct
|
Publicly paid police on or off duty
Private citizens acting at police direction Privately paid police if deputized w/ power to arrest |
|
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy - Protected Areas
|
Persons
Houses Effects Papers |
|
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy - Unprotected Items
|
PAAGVOHO
Paint Scrapes from outside car Account records held by banks Airspace Garbage at the curb Voice Open Fields Handwriting Odors |
|
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy - Standing to Challenge
|
M/invade individual's personal privacy rights, not a 3P's.
Owners of premises always have standing Residents of premises always Overnight guests always w/r/t areas they c/b expected to access Individuals Using Residence for Only Business Purposes = never Passengers in Cars = only if has REP in item searched or seized Owners of seized property = if REP in the area from which the property was taken |
|
Warrant Requirements
|
Probable Cause = fair probability that contraband or some E of crime w/b found in the area searched
- Informant Tips c/b relied - sufficiency relies on police corroboration to allow magistrate to make "common sense practical determination" Particularity = M/specify: - Place to be searched and items to be seized Any affidavit descriptions M/b incorporated explicitly into warrant |
|
Invalid Warrants - Saved by Officer's GF
|
GF overcomes USC defects in PC and particularity
Unavailable: - affidavit is egregiously lacking PC such that no reasonable officer w/h relied on it - application so egregiously lacking... - Officer or DA misled magistrate - Magistrate was biased - wholly abandoned neutrality |
|
Search Warrants - Proper Execution
|
Officers M/comply w/ scope (items and areas to be searched)
Knock and Announce Rule complied with |
|
Knock and Announce Rule
|
Police M/knock and announce presence and purpose before entering a place to be searched
Exceptions = reasonable belief that KAA w/b futile, dangerous OR inhibit investigation |
|
Warrant Requirement - Exceptions
|
ESCAPIST
- Exigent Circumstances - Search Incident to Arrest - Consent - Automobile Exception - Plain View - Inventory Searches - Special Needs of law enforcement, gov't EEs and school officials - Terry Stops/Frisks |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Exigent Circumstances
|
Evanescent E
Hot Pursuit/Fleeing Felon - and any E discovered in plain view w/b admissible |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Search Incident to Arrest
|
Custodial Arrest M/b lawful = need to preserve E and officer safety
Search M/b - Contemporaneous w/ time and place of arrest - Wingspan scope - includes containers and effects Automobiles - NOT the trunk, and so long as arrestee was recent occupant |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Consent
|
M/b voluntary and intelligent
Police d/n/h to inform of right to refuse consent Apparent Authority - valid if officer reasonably believed consenting party had actual authority - shared premises = either party c/g consent - co-tenants who disagree = objector wins as to areas of shared dominion and control |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Automobile Exception
|
M/h PC to believe contraband or E of crime w/b found in vehicle
- traffic stops = d/n need PC at time of stop, but M/prior to search Can search cabin and trunk, including containers, etc., that m/reasonably contain item for which PC to search |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Plain View
|
M/h:
- lawful access to place from which item c/b seen plainly - lawful access to item AND - criminality of item M/b immediately apparent |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Inventory Searches
|
Common when arrested/booked into jail
USC if: - regulations governing are reasonable in scope AND - search complies w/ regulations |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Special Needs
|
Random Drug Testing = okay for RR EEs post-accident, customs officials responsible for drug interdictions, and public school children in extra-curriculars
Probationers homes = warrantless search okay w/ reasoned grounds to believe contraband is present Gov't EE desks and files = to investigate work-related misconduct Students' Effects in Public Schools = to investigate violations of school rules NO ONE has rights at the border w/r/t routine searches of persons and effects |
|
Warrant Exceptions - Terry Stops and Frisks
|
Reasonable Suspicion
STOPS (criminal activity) = brief detention or seizure for purposes of investigating suspicious conduct FRISKS (suspect is armed and dangerous) = pat-down for weapons only out of safety concern - seize only if officer recognizes as contraband w/o manipulating - weapon always c/b seized |
|
When Individuals are Seized (4th A)
|
On totality of circumstances, RP w/n feel free to leave OR to decline officer's request to answer questions
- most encounters w/n/b seizures Airports/Buses = consider officer's tone, weapon, and if told consent c/b refused Pursuit = seizure ONLY when individual submits to officer's authority by stopping OR is physically restrained Traffic Stops = driver and all passengers are seized - Dog Sniffs = if d/n unreasonably delay stop and PC |
|
Exclusionary Rule
|
Physical or Testimonial E obtained in violation of federal or USC statutory provision is inadmissible against individual whose rights were violated
|
|
Exclusionary Rule - 4th A Limits
|
Admissible:
- to impeach D's testimony on C-E - in GJ proceedings, civil proceedings, or parole revocation hearings - KAA violations - Officers' reasonable mistake |
|
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
|
E derived by exploiting un-USC conduct
To Nullify - break causal link b/t original illegality and later-discovered criminal E: - Independent Source - distinct from original illegality - Inevitable Discovery - E necessarily w/h/b obtained lawfully - Attenuation Doctrine - derivative E admitted where D's free will restored through passage of time and intervening events |
|
Wiretapping
|
Warrant required
- PC - Name persons expected to be overheard - Particularly describe conversations that c/b overheard - Time M/b strictly Limited |
|
Eavesdropping
|
Unreliable Ear Doctrine - if you speak to someone who agreed to wiretapping or other electronic monitoring, you have NO 4th A claim
Assumption of Risk = assume risk that other person w/n keep conversation confidential |
|
Arrests - When do they Occur?
|
PC required
When police take a person into custody against her will for interrogation - 4th A permits custodial interrogation for any offense |
|
De Facto Arrests
|
PC required
When police compel someone to come to station for fingerprinting OR questioning |
|
Warrants to Arrest
|
Necessary for:
- arrests in a person's home (u/l emergency) - arrest someone in a 3P's home Not needed to arrest someone in a public place |
|
Common Enterprise Theory
|
Traffic stops where officer discovers E of crime suggesting a common unlawful enterprise b/t driver and passengers = any and all c/b arrested
Based on reasonable inference of shared dominion and control over the contraband |
|
Confessions - USC Challenges
|
DPC of 14th A
6th A Right to Counsel 5th A Miranda Doctrine |
|
14th Amendment DPC
|
Standard = involuntariness
Confession c/n/b result of police coercion |
|
6th Amendment Right to Counsel
|
Offense-Specific right
Attaches when D is formally charged, NOT upon arrest |
|
Miranda Doctrine - Generally
|
Implied in 5th A's self-incrimination clause and is NOT offense specific - interrogation following request for counsel is totally prohibited.
Right to remain silent Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law Right to an attorney If you c/n afford one, you have right to have an attorney appointed for you |
|
Miranda Warnings - When Necessary
|
Custody
- when atmosphere is characterized by police domination and coercion such that suspect's freedom of action is significantly limited Interrogation - any conduct police knew or s/h/k was likely to elicit incriminating response - Exception = immediate public safety concern means no Miranda necessary and incriminating statements are admissible Note: d/n apply to spontaneous statements! |
|
Miranda Waiver
|
Knowing and intelligent - M/understand rights and consequences of waiver
Voluntary P will bear BOP on valid waiver - silence or shoulder-shrugging NOT ENOUGH |
|
Miranda Rights Asserted
|
When suspect requests counsel, ALL interrogation M/stop u/l suspect initiates it.
Resumption = police M/scrupulously honor request not to answer questions AND obtain a valid waiver before initiating questioning |
|
Miranda Violations - Limits on Exclusion of Evidence
|
Inadmissible in P's case-in-chief BUT c/b used to impeach D on C-E.
- Admission of improper Testimonial E will not overturn D's guilty verdict if gov't proves BRD that error was harmless b/c D w/h/b convicted even w/o tainted E Tangible = no requirement to suppress physical fruits of unwarned but voluntary statements |
|
Pre-Trial Identifications
|
Line Ups
Show Ups = one on one confrontations b/t W and suspect Photo Arrays |
|
Pre-Trial Identifications - Rights to Counsel
|
5th A right does NOT apply
6th A right to counsel exists for line ups and show ups taking place AFTER formal charging and not for photo arrays |
|
Pre-Trial Identification DP Standard
|
Violates DPC when it is so unnecessarily suggestive that there is a substantial likelihood of mis-identification
- will result in exclusion of W's in-court ID C/b Remedied: - P M/prove it's based on observations of suspect other than the un-USC ID - Factors = W's opportunity to view D, certainty of her ID, AND specificity of her description to police |
|
Grand Juries - Generally
|
Issue indictments
Proceedings are not public States d/n/h to use GJs as part of the charging process |
|
Pre-Trial Detentions
|
Standard = PC to bind P over for trial AND to detain her in jail pre-trial
Detention hearings to determine PC not necessary if GJ issued indictment or magistrate issued warrant |
|
First Appearance (after arrest)
|
D M/b brought before magistrate who will:
- advise her of her rights - set bail (immediately appealable) AND - appoint counsel if necessary |
|
Trial Rights & Voir Dire
|
P M/disclose all material exculpatory E to criminal D
Right to unbiased judge (w/ no financial stake in outcome and no actual malice towards D) Right to jury trial if maximum sentence exceeds 6m 6-12 jurors representing a cross-section of the community Peremptory Challenges - both sides m/exclude w/o stating reasons - c/n exclude on basis of race or gender |
|
Exception to D's Right to Confront Adverse Ws
|
Does not apply when face-to-face confrontation contravenes important public policy concerns
|
|
Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel
|
M/show
- counsel's performance was deficient AND - but for that the outcome w/b different Pretty much always denied u/l colorable argument that D is not guilty |
|
Plea Taking Colloquy
|
Judge M/address to D on the record:
- nature of the charge - maximum authorized sentence and any mandatory minimums - D's right to plead not guilty and proceed to trial - by pleading guilty, D waives trial and proceeds directly to sentencing |
|
Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas After Sentencing
|
Problem w/ Plea Taking Colloquy
Jurisdictional defect D prevailed on ineffective assistance of counsel claim P fails to fulfill her part of the bargain (GPs treated like Ks!) |
|
Death Penalty & 8th Amendment
|
8th A prohibits criminal penalties that are grossly disproportionate to the seriousness of the offense
Death Penalty violates 8th A when it creates automatic category for imposition of DP. Prohibited against: - mentally retarded - presently insane Ds - minor Ds (at time of relevant offense) Note: Jurors M/b allowed to consider ALL potentially-mitigating E in deciding whether to impose DP |
|
Double Jeopardy
|
Being put twice in jeopardy for the same offense of life or limb by the same sovereign
- jury trial when jury is sworn - bench trial when first W is sworn - guilty plea = when court accepts it unconditionally |
|
Double Jeopardy - Same Offense
|
Not the same for DJ if each has an element the other does not
|
|
Double Jeopardy - Same Sovereign
|
State and federal gov'ts not the same, or different states
States and municipalities are the same sovereign |
|
Double Jeopardy - Exceptions When Retrials are Permitted
|
Hung jury
Mistrial for manifest necessity (hospitalization) Retrial after successful appeal D's br/plea bargain |
|
5th Amendment Privilege Against Compelled Testimony
|
Use it or lose it!
- anyone can assert at any proceeding in which an individual testifies under oath (civil, administrative and Congressional hearings) - does NOT apply to state's use of our bodies Note: P c/n comment on its assertion (negative or otherwise) |
|
Eliminating 5th Amendment Privilege
|
Use and Derivative Use Immunity = P c/n use D's testimony or anything derived from it to convict D if she offers this
D takes the stand - waived as to anything w/in C-E scope SOL = if run on underlying crime, M/testify |