• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/21

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

21 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

CS US pairing ,


Presenting CS without US ,


Decrease of CR

Extinction

Increasing CS US trials slows extinction

--

Condition expectation can elicit a preparatory or compensatory response to the impending US

Condition compensatory responses

Decrease reaction to a drug larger doses are required to achieve the same effect

Tolerance

CS pre exposure effect; when I familiar S is more difficult to condition as a CS then the novel S

Latent inhibition

US processing determines which stimuli become conditioned stimulus


Ss > CS

US modulation theory

Processing of CS determines which CS becomes associated with the US

CS modulation theory

CS Macintosh modulation theory

CS initially predicted nothing, salience decreased.



Slows learning with previous learned CS

Bodies tendency to gravitate towards equilibrium

Homeostasis

Condition responding to drug pair cues typically in the form of a compensatory response associated with drug craving.

Cue Reactivity

Understanding current findings and predicting future learning outcomes

Learning Theory

Recorla-Wagner Model

Predicts CR strengths by trial



CR strength increases but to a lesser degree each time. (negative acceleration)

The extent of increase in strength of the association and therefore the extent of the CR is based on the degree of

Prediction error

The difference between subjects exclamation of US and whether the US actually occurred

Prediction error

RW model is based on a ________ which reduces the likelihood of prediction errors over many trials.



Only surprising or unpredicted US's are capable of triggering learning

Error correction rule

Simultaneously presenting to stimuli

Compound conditioning

2 stimuli

The individual associative weights of CS-1and CS-2 increase slowly from trial to trial, while their sum increases rapidly

I theory of learning in which all of the cues that occur during a trial and all the changes that result I considered a single event

Trial level model

A conditioning procedure in which there is no Temporal gap at the end of the CS and the beginning of US, and in which CS terminates with us



••••••••••••••••••••


________________•

Delay conditioning

A conditioning procedure in which there's a Temporel gap between the end of the CS in the beginning of the US.



•••••••••


______________••

Trace conditioning

The Temporel gap between the onset of the CS in the onset of the US

Interstimulus interval