• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Defences against the Mandament van Spolie: List the three

- Dispute the Facta Probanda


- Challenge applicant's Locus Standi


- Argue Counter Spoliation

Protection of Possession: Interdicts


List Requirements and Cases

- Current or Anticipated Interference


- Valid reason - proof of entitlement


- No other remedy available



(Setlogelo - set out requirements)


(Candid Electronics - objective of alternate remedy must be different)

3 requirements


2 cases

Possessory Action Requirements

- Prima Facie proof of Entitlement


- Prove that Defendant has Control or they were responsible for spoliation


- Ius Possidendi

Disputing Facta Probanda of Mandament van Spolie

-Disprove Possession


- No corpus


- No Animus


- Not Uninterrupted (Mbangi)


-Disprove Spoliation


- Prove legal dispossession

How to Challenge Locus Standi of an Applicant for Mandament van Spolie

- Can't meet objective: Doesn't prevent taking the law into one's own hands (Xsinet)


- Impossible to restore the Status quo ante


-Thing is destroyed


-Thing is in possession of a third party


-(Rikhotso v Northcliff)


-(Tswelopele v Tshwane)


-Took too long to institute


-(Jaimieson v Loderf)


-Ngqukumba - Illegal is fine

Other types of Protection of Possession

- Delictual Action


- Declaratory order


- Condictio Furtiva


- Constitutional Possessory Remedy

Aim of the Mandament van Spolie

- Immediate Restoration of Possession


- Ignoring Merits

Requirements for Mandament van Spolie

- Peaceful and Undisturbed Possession


- Unlawful Dispossession

Mandament van Spolie: Peaceful and Undisturbed Possession


How to prove & cases

- Prove Corpus and Animus


Mbangi


De Beer


Jamieson


Buffalo City

Mandament van Spolie: Unlawful Dispossession Cases

Nino Bonino


Buffalo City


Xsinet

Application of Mandament van Spolie to Incorporeals


Details and Cases

Quasi-Possession


- Protects Right to Use


- Doesn't apply to Contractual rights


(Right must be Servitudal in Nature or Incidental to Possession)


- Bon Quelle


- Impala Water


- Scholtz


- Strümpher


- Van Rhyn