Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
10 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
Define Institutionalisation.
|
A term for the effects of living in an institutionalised setting.
|
|
|
Define the term institution
|
Place like a hospital or an orphanage where children live for long, continuous periods of time.
|
|
|
List problems w/ institutions
|
- Very little emotional care provided, as children living in this situation cannot see enough of any one carer to develop an attachment. - Possible effects include social, mental & physical underdevelopment. |
|
|
A & P of Rutter's English & Romanian Adoptee Study.
|
Aim - Investigate to what extent loving & nurturing care could make up for the poor early experiences in institutions. Procedure - Natural & Longitudinal experiment. - 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain to assess their physical, cognitive & emotional development @ ages 4, 6, 11 & 15. - IV = age of adoption w/ 3 groups, adopted: before 6 months, between 6 months & 2yrs & after 2 yrs. - Info gathered by interviews w/ parents & teachers. - Progress was compare to 52 British children adopted in the UK before the age of 6 months.
|
|
|
F & C of Rutter's English & Romanian Adoptee Study
|
Findings - Effects of Institutionalisation Mental Retardation - When Romanian adoptees arrived In Britain, half showed signs of retardation. - By age of 4 most of Romanian children adopted before 6 months had caught up w/ British counterparts. - @ age 11 the mean IQ: adopted before 6 months (102), between 6 months & 2yrs (86) & @ 2 yrs (77). - Appears damage to intellectual development as a result of institutionalisation can be recovered provided adoption takes place before 6 months (age when attachments are formed). Disinhibited Attachment - Adopted after 6 months = showed signs of disinhibited attachment. - Symptoms include: attention seeking, clinginess & friendliness to any adult that is available (treats all adults the same) & a tendency to go off w/ strangers. - Children adopted before 6 months rarely show this attachment. - Attachment = adaptation to living w/ multiple CG during the sensitive period for attachment formation. - In poor quality institutions a child might have 50 carers, none of whom they see enough to form a secure attachment. Conclusion - Findings suggest children can recover from institutionalisation if they have good quality care. - Removal from institutional care should occur before 6 months. |
|
|
P, F & C of La Mare's Bucharest Early Intervention Project
|
Procedure - Reported findings from a longitudinal study of 36 Romanian orphans adopted by families in Canada. - Were compared to a matched control group. - DV = physical growth & health. - B/c previous research had shown that lack of emotional care rather than poor nourishment is the cause of what has been called deprivation dwarfism. Findings - Effects of Institutionalisation Physical Underdevlopment - Adopted orphans were typically smaller than control group @ age 4 & a half. - Difference disappeared by 10 & a half yrs. - True for physical health too. Conclusion - Recovery from the effects of institutionalisation on physical development is possible.
|
|
|
Strength of Research into the Effects of Institutionalisation: Real Life Application
|
- Research has enhanced our understanding of the effects of institutionalisation. - Led to improvements in the way children are cared for in institutions. - E.G. orphanages & children's homes now avoid having large no. of CGs for each child. - Instead ensure that a smaller no. of people play a cenral role for the child - Key worker. - This means children have a chance to develop normal attachments & helps avoid disinhibited attachment. - Strength = immensely valuable in practical terms. |
- What has research enhanced our understanding of? - What has it led to improvements in? - What do orphanges & children's home now avoid doing? - What do they do instead, and what are these people called? - What will this allow (attachment)? |
|
Strength of Research into the Effects of Institutionalisation: Value of Longitudinal Studies
|
- Studies have followed the lives of children over many yrs. - This takes a lot of time & planning but benefits are large. - W/out studies we may mistakenly conclude that major effects of early institutional care are irreversible. - But Rutter & La Mare have shown effects may disappear after sufficient amount of time w/ early intervention. - Research strengthens the argument that recovery even after severe privation is possible provide children move to loving environment. - Common problem w/ longitudinal research = subject attrition. - Pp's drop out. - Limittion b/c particular kinds of pp's, such as those that are n ot well adjusted, = more likely to drop out. - Leads to biased sample = can't generalise findings. |
- What is a longitudinal study? - What may we have wrongly concluded w/out research h into effects of institutionalisation? - But what did this research show? -Which strengthens what argument? - What is a common problem w/ longitudinal studies? - How is this limiting? |
|
Limitation of Research into the Effects of Institutionalisation: Romanian Orphans were not Typical
|
- It is possible that conditions were so bad, Romanian orphanages, that results cannot be applied to understanding the impact of better quality institutional care or any situations where children experience deprivation. - E.G. Romanian orphanages had particularly poor standards of care, especially when it came to forming any relationship w/ other children, & extremely low levels od intellectual stimulation . - Extreme experiences of privation = studies lack generalisation due to unusual situational variables. - This question the population validity of Romanian orphan studies. |
- Poor conditions in orphanages may mean that results cannot be applied to our understanding of what? - List qualities that made Romanian orphanages bad. - Extreme experiences of privation mean the studies lack... - What does this question? |
|
Limitation of Research into the Effects of Institutionalisation: Natural Experiment
|
-Methodological issues for Rutter's ERA project is that children were not randomly assigned to 3 conditions. - Researcher didn't interfere w/ adoption process = children adopted early may have been more sociable, a confounding variable. - Wouldn't have been possible to manipulate IV in Rutter's research as this would involve allocating children to either institutional care or foster care. - Would be methodologically be better b/c removes confounding variable of which children are chosen by parents. - However, raises huge ethical issues. - Highlights importance of ethical consideration when conducting research on adopted children, due to possible long-term effects of institutionalisation. |
- What is a methodological issue of Rutter's study? - What didn't the research interfere w/ & why may this cause a confounding variable? - Why wouldn't it have able to manipulate the IV in this study but why is this methodologically better? - However, what does this raise? |