• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/42

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

42 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Schenck v. US
speech can be limited if there is a clear and present danger
Gitlow v. NY
1st incorporation case, free speech rights
Texas v. Johnson
flag burning okay, symbolic speech
Tinker v. Des Moines
symbolic speech (armbands)
Brandenberg v. Ohio
speech can be limited if it incites lawlessness
Near v. Minnesota
prior restraint not allowed
NY Times v. Sullivan
malice must be proven to claim libel
Miller v. California
definition of obscenity left to states (1973)
Roth v. US
obscenity not protected by free speech (1957)
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
school officials can limit free press
Engel v. Vitale
establishment clause, government cannot force prayer in schools
Lemon v. Kurtzman
guidelines for government aid to parochial schools, Lemon test
Santa Fe v. Doe
prayers led by students at school functions not okay
Schemp v. Abbington Township
teachers cannot lead prayers
Wallace v. Jaffree
moments of silence for prayer not okay
Oregon v. Smith
drug use in religious ceremonies
Reynolds v. US
polygamy not okay
NAACP v. Alabama
freedom to assemble/ membership lists
DeJonge v. Oregon
freedom to assemble even as communist party
Mapp v. Ohio
exclusionary rule applied to states
Wolf v. Colorado
states don't have to apply the exclusionary rule
Bond v. US
feeling luggage constitutes illegal search
New Jersey v. TLO
reasonable suspicion can be used in schools
Terry v. Ohio
searches may be conducted for officer's safety
Miranda v. Arizona
must understand rights/self incrimination
Escobedo v. Illinois
must provide an attorney during questioning
Gideon v. Wainwright
attorney must be provided
Furman v. Georgia
death penalty not okay
Gregg v. Georgia
death penalty okay/up to states
Robinson v. California
cruel and unusual punishment, cannot be imprisoned because of addiction
Roe v. Wade
abortion right
Cruzon v. Missouri
right to die
Griswold v. Connecticut
right of privacy/ penumbras
Reed v. Reed
gender discrimination/ intermediate test
Craig v. Boren
gender discrimination/ intermediate test
UC v. Bakke
no racial quotas, affirmative action okay
Korematsu v. US
at time of war detainment is okay
Adarand v. Pena
strict scrutiny on affirmative action programs
US v. Lopez
federal government could not make gun laws for slates and school (state power)
Buckley v. Valeo
individuals should be able to donate as much as they wish, that is free speech
Barron v. Baltimore
BIll of Rights only applied to national government
Clinton v. NY
line item veto is unconstitutional