• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

White

But For Test


Factual Causation

Smith

Legal Causation


Accused Act need not be the sole cause or even the main cause of the consequence


Must be substantive and operative

Williams

Chain of Causation is Broken


Victim does something so crazy and unpredictable

Jordan

Chain of Causation is Broken


Third party deliberately intervenes - medical negligence

Blaue

Take your victim as you find them


(Refusing Blood) Thin Skull Rule

Gibbins & Proctor

Causation by Omission


Familial Duty of Care


Dad didn't feed his kid

Pittwood

Causation by Omission


Contractual Duty of Care


Crossing guard who went on lunch break

Stone & Dobson

Causation by Omission


Assumption of Responsibility


Two idiots take care of one of theirs idiot sister who dies

Miller

Causation by Omission


Creating a Dangerous Situation


Hobo fell asleep with a lit cigarette, he woke up to a small mattress fire, moved rooms and went to sleep


Actions Created a duty

Dytham

Causation by Omission


Public Office


Police officer who saw a man get beat to death by a bouncer outside a nightclub

Mohan

Direct Intention


D acts deliberately


D drove at a police officer

Woollin

Indirect Intention


Foresees the result, doesn't necessarily desire it


Applies Nedrick to create test


D slammed his baby into the ground


1)Death or GBH virtually certain because of D's actions?


2) D appreciated that was the case?

Nedrick

Indirect Intention


Foresight of virtual certainty


D poured fuel through a letterbox of a woman he hated, result was virtually certain

Cunningham

Subjective Reckleness


D foresaw the risk of the prohibited result and still took the risk


Ripped a gas meter off, gas killed mother in-law

Byrne

Diminished Responsibility


Abnormality of mental functioning


Recognized mental condition


He had crazy sexual urges, so he mutilated his a lady

4-Stage Test for Constructive Manslaughter

1) D does an intentional Act


2) The act is unlawful


3) The act is dangerous - Church


4) Act causes death

.

done