• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Absolute deterrence

Refers to the effect of having some legal punishment over having no legal punishment

Marginal deterrence

Refers to the effect of increasing the severity, certainty, and/or swiftness of legal punishment


Higher for instrumental (planned) crimes

General deterrence

Occurs when people decide not to break the law because they fear legal punishment

Specific (individual) deterrence

Occurs when offenders already punishment for law breaking decide not to commit another crime (recidivism) because they do not want to face legal consequences again.

Objective deterrence

Refers to the impact of actual legal punishment

Subjective deterrence

Refers to the impact of people’s perceptions of the certainty and severity of legal punishment.

Certainty

The likelihood of being arrested

Severity

Whether someone is incarcerated and if so, for how long

System capacity argument

When prisons are too full and there is too much crime

Enlightenment

Age of reason during the 17th and 18th centuries.


More scientific understanding of natural and social phenomena that weakened religions influence.

Classical school of criminology

Beccaria believed that people act rationally and with free will (will it cause more pleasure or more pain)


Criminal justice system acts to deter crime than to avenge it.

Positivism

Dominate 19th century


Forces beyond an individuals control determine human behavior.

Rational choice theory (RCT)

Assumes that potential offenders choose whether to commit crime after calculating the possible rewards and risks.


An individual commits crime after deciding the rewards outweigh the risks and vice versus.

Instrumental offenses

Those committed for material gain with some degree of planning


More deferrable !!

Expressive offenses

Those committed for emotional reasons and with little or no planning


Less deterrable!!

Routine activities theory

Criminal victimization patters


1 motivated offenders


2 attractive targets


3 absence of guardianship


Introduced in 1979 by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson


Assumes there will always be motivated offenders

Situational crime prevention (SCP)

Reduce exposure to motivated offenders, decrease target suitability, and increase capable guardianship


Concern is crime displacement

Deterrence theory

Assumes that potential and actual legal punishment can deter crime.