Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
46 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Faith Reason
Theology Philosophy of rel code cult creed religion |
answer on front.
|
|
What is religion
|
Somthing transcednet, does not have to involve a devine.
|
|
Philosophy
|
The love of wisdom
|
|
MetaRational
|
The part of us that ranscends religion
|
|
Mystical expierience
|
The direct encounther with whom someone considers the divine or important.
|
|
antinomion
|
A mysticism is outside any rules
|
|
Epistemology
|
Branch of philosophy that deals with truth claims
|
|
Empiricism
|
If knowlage does not begain with a sensory experience it does not mean anything
|
|
hermaneutics
|
a study of justifying the interpretation of a story. A mode of interpretation
|
|
Numinous
|
Reality that is involved in a religious experience what makes it inneffable
|
|
Uncranny
|
Outside our ability to know
|
|
Catigory
|
Structure of the mind
|
|
Objective
|
Independent of our awareness of it
|
|
Subjective
|
A reality that is dependent on our awareness of it.
|
|
Fascinas
|
Bliss
|
|
Pluristic Hypothesis
|
Many different religlions
|
|
Plurism
|
observation that most religions are mostly the same
|
|
Exclusivims
Inclusivism Plurism |
1. I'm right they are wrong
2 I'm right, tohers believe the same even if they don't know it. 3. Many are right |
|
Tautology
|
Redundant
|
|
Begging the Question
|
Assumption that the conclusion is true before you prooved it, form of circular reasoning.
|
|
Axia Aye
|
A major turning pkoint on religion (600 BC - 100 AD
|
|
Linguistic analysis
|
Only science can give us truth
|
|
dickatomy
|
The division of reality into two things
|
|
Equivocal
|
Using the same terms with two different meanings
|
|
Analogical
|
involving or expressing an analogy
|
|
Impertanance
|
That which does not pertain
|
|
Metaphore
|
Extension of a denotation.
|
|
lexorandi lex credendi
|
The law of praying is the law of believing
|
|
a priori
|
Self Evident
|
|
a posteriori
|
based on observations
|
|
Elements to a good argument
|
Validity (conclusion)
truth (premisis) Soundness (aregument as a whole) |
|
chiliagon
|
So many sides ( a thousand sided figure).
|
|
Teological
|
Design Argument
|
|
Who wrote five ways
|
Aquinas
|
|
Who wrote the ontological argument with chapters
|
St. Anselm
|
|
who wrote idea of the holy (numen)
|
Rudolf Otto
|
|
Who were the british dudes who had the discussion on religious languege
|
Ayer and Copelston
|
|
Who wrote the argument from contingency
|
Taylor
|
|
Who wrote about mysticism
|
William James
|
|
Who wrote about the personal experience of God
|
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
|
|
Who wrote about the core of religion
|
Walter Kaufmann
|
|
Who wrote about the pluralisistic hypothesis
|
John Hick
|
|
Who wrote about the most perfect being
|
Descartes - ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
|
|
Who wrote about natural thology (the design argument)
|
William Paley
|
|
The moral argument - God as a postulate ofpratical reason
|
Immanual Kant
|
|
The female nature of God?
|
Rosemary Ruether
|